Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

betsuni

(29,505 posts)
260. "Destroy" becomes "transform" because it sounds nicer, but it means destroy and punish, ends justify the means.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 02:39 AM
14 hrs ago

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But I think it's just the word. Run on the platform and people will be fine with it. The policies all poll Scrivener7 Yesterday #1
Right on. Run on the principles and ditch the label. Ocelot II Yesterday #2
If we must have tags, progressive is as good as any to step to the left of center. Magoo48 Yesterday #50
Ditching the label is going to be hard. The reich wing media is running with it like and Olympic sprinter Cheezoholic Yesterday #81
Winning is too much for some people. BComplex 7 hrs ago #271
They won three primaries in one of the most liberal cities in the country. SamuelAdams 5 hrs ago #292
Completely agree Lategame Yesterday #5
I agree Felicita Yesterday #31
All we need to do then, is point out that they are social democrats. BComplex 7 hrs ago #272
I will refer you to post #2. Democrats are winning across the country because - Democrat stopdiggin 5 hrs ago #293
"Social Democrats" blubunyip 6 hrs ago #279
lol - and finally we get to the point. TBF 5 hrs ago #294
It's the damn purity tests. And I won't vote for this or that person because...... boston bean Yesterday #7
Purity testing has been the bane of Democrats. Lategame Yesterday #13
The " no purity test" talking points angrychair Yesterday #41
Umm no. No no no no. boston bean Yesterday #54
100%. Thank you. Democrats need to stop blaming others for past failures and adapt to realities. For God's sake, we KPN Yesterday #154
It not the discussion we are talking about creeksneakers2 Yesterday #160
Calling for party loyalty isn't a purity test... it's basic political math. QueerDuck 7 hrs ago #273
Yes, we "vagina voters." How dare we vote for HRC and VP Harris? mcar Yesterday #110
Importantly shore up Social Security as part of a platform. Prairie_Seagull Yesterday #24
T H I S ! ! ! Cosmocat 5 hrs ago #287
Additionally Prairie_Seagull 3 hrs ago #304
Too many words. I am sorry but you will say all of these and your listeners eyes will glaze over question everything Yesterday #33
I was listing the policies the Social Democrats are pushing (as are most Democrats), not a campaign slogan. Scrivener7 Yesterday #43
The problem is not capitalism Soul_of_Wit Yesterday #47
I would add to that the: Corruption, Cruelty and Chaos!! Ars Longa Yesterday #165
My Economics Professor Who Was A Republican BlueKota 19 hrs ago #233
Vulture Capitalism blubunyip 6 hrs ago #281
I hate capitalism I_UndergroundPanther 23 hrs ago #187
DSA is not a political party Soul_of_Wit Yesterday #45
Looking at it as a big tent is the way for the Dem party to thrive. yellow dahlia Yesterday #136
Recommended! hamsterjill Yesterday #46
The hardest part isn't the messaging, it's the money mdbl Yesterday #68
Your point is valid. hamsterjill Yesterday #98
Welcome to the Old Farts Club mdbl 9 hrs ago #261
lol SonOfNebanaube 6 hrs ago #280
The purity tests should end with the primaries mdbl Yesterday #80
SELF destructive. And really ignorant. Scrivener7 Yesterday #103
+1 leftstreet 18 hrs ago #243
Yes, it is just a word. But it's a word that the right will stroke into a frenzy. hadEnuf 8 hrs ago #264
Just "Democrats." We don't need to change our name bc his mouth spewed something. Scrivener7 8 hrs ago #266
No name change, just a clarification of the truth. hadEnuf 7 hrs ago #268
"A word the right will stroke into a frenzy"....like every other word they stroke into a BComplex 6 hrs ago #274
The word socialist means something more than the usual right-wing litany of insults. hadEnuf 3 hrs ago #305
Neither of us know who this country will or won't elect -misanthroptimist Yesterday #3
Because "democrats" didn't vote democratic or didn't vote due to progressive purity. boston bean Yesterday #6
You're sick of people voting their conscience? -misanthroptimist Yesterday #11
Yes their pure conscience helped bring us us mango Mussolini. boston bean Yesterday #15
Really? -misanthroptimist Yesterday #22
The two times we lost we had coronations. Gore1FL Yesterday #26
Or women candidates Blaukraut Yesterday #29
And many who supported Sanders in 2016 voted for Trump. Both offered the same thing question everything Yesterday #37
Only those lacking a BS detector would equate Sanders and Donald (n/m) Soul_of_Wit Yesterday #42
Not today. But in 2016 many did question everything Yesterday #44
And they lacked a BS detector in 2016 (n/m) Soul_of_Wit Yesterday #62
How many? Link to a poll, please (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #82
You can read up on it here. sheshe2 Yesterday #137
Thank you. My cynicism was wrong. (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #143
Not sure about that. AloeVera 22 hrs ago #215
Or you can read a real analysis which shows most of the Trump voters who supported Sanders in Nanjeanne 8 hrs ago #265
Bernie lost the primary because the democratic party wouldn't let him participate in BComplex 6 hrs ago #276
Analyzing how Bernie Sanders supporters voted in the 2016 General Election by Brian Schaffner, Tufts University question everything 23 hrs ago #181
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #73
Her name is Hillary. mr715 Yesterday #77
Also I think if you arent personal friends with somebody, referring to them by their last name is proper SSJVegeta Yesterday #84
I prefer Secretary and Senator Clinton. mr715 Yesterday #89
Truth SSJVegeta Yesterday #91
Huh? TVguyCards Yesterday #147
Sanders: "they turned to Trump because Trump said things that made sense." betsuni 23 hrs ago #176
I do not believe that either Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris lost. yellow dahlia Yesterday #149
YES!! Yellow dahlia nailed it! BComplex 6 hrs ago #278
Thanks, BC. I have paid so much attention to these two elections since November 2016, yellow dahlia 5 hrs ago #290
And it freaks me out to this day that democrats weren't shouting this from the rafters! BComplex 5 hrs ago #296
Exactly! In 2016 I read an article that raised the alarm about the election results, yellow dahlia 4 hrs ago #302
That is simply false mcar Yesterday #115
I agree with you that the nomination should not have been stolen from Bernie. yellow dahlia Yesterday #145
The DNC did not rig anything. creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #174
Sanders: "I wouldn't use the word rigged, because we knew what the rules were -- but what betsuni 22 hrs ago #213
That interview w/ Bernie was before the leaked emails that were revealed in July and November 2016. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #221
Sanders: "If they went into our emails I'm sure there would be statements that would betsuni 17 hrs ago #249
I never said Bernie said there was rigging, but others of us did. yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #253
What are you talking about? mcar 21 hrs ago #220
This is what I am talking about. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #222
That didn't change the popular vote iemanja 18 hrs ago #236
The DNC conspired so that Bernie wouldn't get the nomination, in the primary. yellow dahlia 18 hrs ago #240
She got the popular vote in the primary iemanja 18 hrs ago #244
The primaries and nomination involve more than just the popular vote. yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #246
I've stated the facts iemanja 17 hrs ago #248
The super - delegates are not determined by the will of the people - on the contrary. yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #250
"Sanders could not have possibly won the nomination after May 3 -- at that point, he needed 984 betsuni 15 hrs ago #259
Hillary Clinton received 3.7 million more votes than Bernie Sanders Quiet Em 16 hrs ago #252
It's about the Super - Delegates. yellow dahlia 16 hrs ago #254
It was fair. It wasn't even close. Quiet Em 16 hrs ago #255
Yes the lawsuit was thrown out, due to lack of standing. The judge said the DNC did indeed undermine yellow dahlia 15 hrs ago #256
The people did pick the nominee. Quiet Em 15 hrs ago #258
Actually, the judge said he "assumed" the plaintiff's positions to determine Nixie 2 hrs ago #307
It's called voting. Conspiracy theories about rigging and plots oppressing "victims" is a problem. betsuni 23 hrs ago #186
We lost the Supreme Court because of that "purity". "Conscience" is not the same thing lostincalifornia Yesterday #67
The Supreme Court WAS lost due to "purity testing" - just not the way you think. AloeVera 22 hrs ago #206
I disagree with your use of the word "fact". yellow dahlia Yesterday #139
Best evidence possible creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #182
The article does not say that Democrats were driven by conscience, and so pissed off that Bernie didn't get the yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #197
Its not the only time it ever happened creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #199
The point I'm making is - bitter Dems DID NOT cost Hillary Clinton the election. yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #201
I've never seen any evidence of any election fraud. creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #203
That is not the primary point. The NPR article DID NOT claim that bitter Dems cost Hillary Clinton the election. yellow dahlia 22 hrs ago #209
fine creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #211
NOT a "fact". The republican media brought us to this place, plus billionaires BComplex 6 hrs ago #275
I have to agree with boston bean in that I'm sick of people on our side not understanding what a vote actually is. Scrivener7 Yesterday #49
You're going to be sick a long time -misanthroptimist Yesterday #58
Require Civics class in high school. Scrivener7 Yesterday #99
There are limits -misanthroptimist Yesterday #123
Michigan voters who didn't vote chose a bus that took them to Wyoming then blew up with them inside it. Scrivener7 Yesterday #125
Hypothetically -misanthroptimist Yesterday #132
When that situation arises, we can talk about it. Scrivener7 Yesterday #135
Then it wouldn't be hypothetical, right? -misanthroptimist Yesterday #141
You do you. Scrivener7 Yesterday #142
I'm irrelevant -misanthroptimist Yesterday #144
I hope they take a good look at the result of their choice creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #185
Some will -misanthroptimist 23 hrs ago #195
I hope so. creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #196
Good analogy. I'm in 100% agreement. oasis Yesterday #66
But if 100% of the growth is in the suburbs, maybe it's time to extend the circle line. meadowlander Yesterday #79
The OP is about something happening now, not "people on our side not understanding what a vote actually is" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #90
I'm concerned about future ones. Because it has happened in every previous one I can think of. Scrivener7 Yesterday #100
So you're happy with a pre-emptive "fuck the other people on the left" OP? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #105
I don't really know what you're on about. No, I'm not refighting anything. And that's not how I read the OP. Scrivener7 Yesterday #107
"Because it has happened in every previous one I can think of" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #112
Oh it's refighting? It's not just recalling or what one calls remembering? boston bean Yesterday #151
Yes, when you accuse your opponents of "cannibalizing" the party, muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #156
Some comprehension would be very helpful here. boston bean Yesterday #158
Some meaningful writing in the OP would have been very helpful. muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #161
Nope. 👎 boston bean 23 hrs ago #180
The bus, however, should be free mr715 Yesterday #96
It is! That's the beauty! Scrivener7 Yesterday #101
That's the best description I've seen buzzycrumbhunger Yesterday #108
Love this analogy! mcar Yesterday #116
Well done! A very apt analogy! Abolishinist 23 hrs ago #198
I voted my conscience in 2016 and 2024 mcar Yesterday #114
And I respect your views -misanthroptimist Yesterday #127
The people who desert us keep saying that creeksneakers2 Yesterday #166
How can they ignore the 5 million people who are losing health care creeksneakers2 Yesterday #171
You are indeed free to give you opinion -misanthroptimist 23 hrs ago #173
I've never changed a mind creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #177
Aren't you advocating for more of the same? Renew Deal Yesterday #113
Obama was exceptional. Clinton was highly competent BUT had both sides dragging her down, ALONG WITH RandomNumbers Yesterday #21
If, in 2006, someone had said... -misanthroptimist Yesterday #27
Then you don't remember it well angrychair Yesterday #51
I didn't know about PUMAS. I learn something every day. yellow dahlia Yesterday #159
But Clinton herself supported Obama after the primary. Very soon after, RandomNumbers 6 hrs ago #284
Die-hard Hillary supporters spawned their own website, too: Rob H. 2 hrs ago #308
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Yesterday #4
See ya bye orangecrush Yesterday #8
Ya think? boston bean Yesterday #9
The vocal far left from the big cities is the voice we get labeled with and costs us votes. Melon Yesterday #10
"Far left" Mysterian Yesterday #124
There is a spectrum of beliefs within every party. Melon Yesterday #129
There are no "far left" politicians in the Democratic party Mysterian Yesterday #131
No. My beliefs have been very similar since post college with slight adjustments. Melon Yesterday #138
According to your post #10, the spectrum in the Democratic party is all the way from "moderate" to "conservative" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #140
Sorry...typing on a tablet. Melon Yesterday #148
Thanks - that makes sense (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #150
Why do you think a democratic socialist will be the nominee in 2028? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #12
I am baffled by your forgetfulness of recent history. boston bean Yesterday #14
Party unity isn't achieved by the left acquiescing to the centrists Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #23
I don't see how affordability creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #188
I voted for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton Soul_of_Wit Yesterday #38
Which self identified democratic socialist has announced a run for president? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #16
What? boston bean Yesterday #17
A quote from the OP, which you wrote: muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #20
I haven't seen AOC tear the party down creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #190
That might be what's behind the OP muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #204
I think its about what is going on right here. creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #205
Not just for that creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #237
That's a lot of "what ifs" for people to be "sick of this fucking shit" over 2 years before (nt) muriel_volestrangler 18 hrs ago #242
Not terribly unlikely ones though. creeksneakers2 17 hrs ago #245
I don't think she could win as president in 2028. She could win US Senate. LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #232
They said she might try that. creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #238
I recommend Xanax. mr715 Yesterday #18
Yep, centrism works so well. Oh wait... orthoclad Yesterday #19
How do we taste? You're the one doing the cannibalizing. mr715 Yesterday #25
I was going to ask what wine i pair best with n/t gay texan Yesterday #69
You are a Texan? mr715 Yesterday #75
Yes! N/t gay texan Yesterday #76
Chianti. AloeVera Yesterday #117
Gracious! H2O Man Yesterday #28
Agreed. The midterms are crucial. We need to save Democracy. yellow dahlia Yesterday #162
Some people are addicted to the drama. Same as it ever was. demmiblue 9 hrs ago #262
Well said Auggie Yesterday #30
Can you explain what "this shit" is, then? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #34
Suspect it's Mamdani-backed candidates winning in the New York primaries meadowlander Yesterday #39
I agree with " we should be running the candidate that can win the district" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #63
It's "we get smeared with the views of the most extreme amongst us" meadowlander Yesterday #70
I agree with you. I'm hoping that someone who recommended the OP muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #78
Shit that is going on creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #194
Thank you for being specific. muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #207
Wasn't the case before creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #210
Word! yellow dahlia Yesterday #163
Kamala is talking with Mamdani creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #191
I never said "this shit." The OP did. Auggie Yesterday #85
You said the OP was "well said" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #93
You are wicked sharp orangecrush Yesterday #146
Vote on policy duckworth969 Yesterday #32
"... contact the centrist of your choice..." Shipwack Yesterday #83
Kudos to you for understanding nuance. yellow dahlia Yesterday #164
Nope creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #214
"... contact the centrist of your choice..." Shipwack Yesterday #86
And there it is. Exactly what I speak of. boston bean Yesterday #130
Yet another OP attacking progressives angrychair Yesterday #35
I'm a progressive and I very much agree with OP. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #55
The OP is largely refering to primary challenges. Not whether dems are supported. SSJVegeta Yesterday #59
The OP was talking about electing a president and not tearing down Democrats. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #65
"Tearing down" seemed to mean being democratic socialist. And came with few specifics SSJVegeta Yesterday #71
That's not what they want angrychair Yesterday #126
Right on! creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #208
It is the website for you. SSJVegeta Yesterday #56
The forum needs you. We need all voices. yellow dahlia Yesterday #167
The existential threat to labor and young people by AI and robotics in the next ten years meadowlander Yesterday #36
THIS gay texan Yesterday #74
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia Yesterday #168
Then after the primaries we should all pull together creeksneakers2 21 hrs ago #216
I think of what popsdenver Yesterday #40
I believe the destruction that followed the 2016 election is circumstantial evidence that yellow dahlia Yesterday #172
It is pathetic. Have we forgotten 2000, 2016, and 2024? We lost at those critical times lostincalifornia Yesterday #48
Democratic voters are being influenced by third parties, such as the Green Party and Party for Socialism and Liberation. LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #231
"Destroy" becomes "transform" because it sounds nicer, but it means destroy and punish, ends justify the means. betsuni 14 hrs ago #260
I'm not saying it's right or wrong angrychair 18 hrs ago #235
People are told that Democrats aren't progressive -- labeling them establishment/centrist/corporatist, etc. . betsuni Yesterday #52
Nobody in the Democratic party was talking about universal health care or raising the minimum wage before Bernie was. meadowlander Yesterday #61
No. Ted Kennedy had been saying health care is a right, not a privilege since the '70s. betsuni Yesterday #106
Right, except I was alive through all of those election cycles meadowlander Yesterday #119
That's because its true creeksneakers2 21 hrs ago #218
And Hillary as First Lady fighting for universal healthcare. boston bean 20 hrs ago #226
She was responsible for the Children's Health Insurance Program too, which nobody seems to know. betsuni 18 hrs ago #241
Coalition building! yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #175
Really? sheshe2 23 hrs ago #192
I remember Hillary Clinton's proposals for universal healthcare. Nixie Yesterday #102
Yes, new definition of universal health care is Medicare for All only as purity test. betsuni Yesterday #128
++++ Nixie 21 hrs ago #217
Yep. mcar Yesterday #118
Vermont was literally the reddest state in the country until it elected Bernie.And it still elects republicans regularly SSJVegeta Yesterday #53
Oklahoma, Wyoming, Idaho, Louisiana etc would like a word. BannonsLiver 23 hrs ago #183
Um.Most of those states were blue when Bernie was elected in 1990 SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #228
IMHO, Democrats overestimate everything about the voting public:..... ColoringFool Yesterday #57
The focus should be on the GOP and not anyone of any persuasion that identifies as a Democrat. walkingman Yesterday #60
Word! yellow dahlia Yesterday #134
Word! yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #179
thank you - I swear these threads are going to kill us TBF 19 hrs ago #234
K & R SunSeeker Yesterday #64
"Your views aren't welcome unless you suppress them." David__77 Yesterday #72
Touch grass. Stacey Grove Yesterday #87
Really! wolfie001 5 hrs ago #298
America elected FDR to 4 terms IronLionZion Yesterday #88
Good rant lefthandedskyhook Yesterday #92
FIGHT OLIGARCHY usonian Yesterday #94
my beef w them is the blatant antisemitism. mopinko Yesterday #95
Netanyahu Gaza genocide of civilians is not acceptable DemocracyForever 23 hrs ago #184
propaganda. mopinko 23 hrs ago #193
Killing children is propaganda? DemocracyForever 23 hrs ago #202
Left Center Right dave99 Yesterday #97
Where did this come from? mcar Yesterday #121
I agree larwdem Yesterday #104
K&R mcar Yesterday #109
Thanks for sharing the status quo position. Renew Deal Yesterday #111
And we can't just sit by while the fucking Heritage Foundation takes a wrecking ball to our rights and freedoms. Initech Yesterday #120
The ONLY winning strategy is voting blue in the general. Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #122
I understand where you are coming from and feel/think we should call progressive Democrats, FDR Democrats. cksmithy Yesterday #133
"Progressive" orangecrush Yesterday #152
Calling someone an "FDR Democrat" is incredibly backward-looking muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #153
Yes a progressive is a good thing, all I said is a Democratic socialist, cksmithy 23 hrs ago #200
Have to agree blubunyip 5 hrs ago #297
I'm personally a progressive, but also pragmatic. Despite what some people believe, we are basically a Raftergirl Yesterday #155
Love your post!!! creeksneakers2 Yesterday #157
I remember people here saying Obama would never be elected Skittles Yesterday #169
At my job the average age is about 27. Eko Yesterday #170
I felt this way 25 years ago. Alice B. 7 hrs ago #267
+1 leftstreet 6 hrs ago #277
... demmiblue 23 hrs ago #178
The status quo isn't working DemocracyForever 23 hrs ago #189
If you see the political struggle in the US as Left vs Right then you are part of the PROBLEM Tim S 22 hrs ago #212
"Democratic Socialists recognize it and want change to rebalance things." Buddyzbuddy 20 hrs ago #230
People are eventually going to tire of MAGA policies EnergizedLib 21 hrs ago #219
Eventually? mr715 20 hrs ago #223
And do we need Florida to control Washington? EnergizedLib 20 hrs ago #224
We need Florida to at least partially sink into the sea... mr715 20 hrs ago #225
I'm watching the Michigan senate race. It looks like El-Sayed will win the primary. LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #227
It looks to me more and more that... WestMichRad 20 hrs ago #229
yup - and btw Skittles 18 hrs ago #239
I don't know if the Democratic Socialist brand is the right thing, but the candidates themselves are who will save us. Music Man 17 hrs ago #247
IMO the "socialist" label moondust 16 hrs ago #251
If this is about Chevalier, yeah, she has said some stupid shit in the past Quiet Em 15 hrs ago #257
Agree / disagree 4bonhoffer 9 hrs ago #263
Exactly. The fact that there is even discourse about whether or not the Democrats would be better than what we have now. madibella 7 hrs ago #269
The ratchet analogy is quite illustrative here Orrex 7 hrs ago #270
"I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat." krawhitham 6 hrs ago #282
Yadda, yadda, yadda. Here are some basic facts for you indusurb 6 hrs ago #283
This message was self-deleted by its author nankerphelge 5 hrs ago #285
Sure, just hoist the white flag and accept the status quo. Scruffy1 5 hrs ago #286
We lost Bernie voters to the Idiot in Chief IbogaProject 5 hrs ago #288
Exactly agree! SamuelAdams 5 hrs ago #289
"Hamas slogans"? wolfie001 4 hrs ago #301
Biden had much narrower Congressional majorities in his first two years because Soul_of_Wit 4 hrs ago #303
Socialism represents public power. Of course Republican and centrists are going to fight this. Fuck em! Emile 5 hrs ago #291
My Social Security check every month is Socialism and I'm still crying about it! Medicare too! wolfie001 5 hrs ago #300
NO Chi67 5 hrs ago #295
..... wolfie001 5 hrs ago #299
I don't understand your logic. CrimsonBight 3 hrs ago #306
"Joe Biden was a great president." Rob H. 2 hrs ago #309
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We just fucking cannibali...»Reply #260