Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hadEnuf

(3,690 posts)
264. Yes, it is just a word. But it's a word that the right will stroke into a frenzy.
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 08:33 AM
5 hrs ago

And they are already doing it.

I think a more accurate word to describe these people may be Democratic capitalists, because anything with the word "social" will be completely twisted into a boogeyman. We have been a blend of capitalism along with strong social programs and regulations that make the rich pay their fair share (at least we used to be) and it worked well. But the pro-oligarch right will use anything in their media to sabotage that.

It's also worth noting that Trump and his henchmen are facing some real problems if Democrats take the house and/or senate. I believe he will do nearly anything to prevent that so don't be surprised if we suddenly have a "communist invasion" that requires a state of emergency before the mid-terms. It sounds crazy but these people are crazy.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But I think it's just the word. Run on the platform and people will be fine with it. The policies all poll Scrivener7 Yesterday #1
Right on. Run on the principles and ditch the label. Ocelot II Yesterday #2
If we must have tags, progressive is as good as any to step to the left of center. Magoo48 23 hrs ago #50
Ditching the label is going to be hard. The reich wing media is running with it like and Olympic sprinter Cheezoholic 23 hrs ago #81
Winning is too much for some people. BComplex 4 hrs ago #271
They won three primaries in one of the most liberal cities in the country. SamuelAdams 2 hrs ago #292
Completely agree Lategame Yesterday #5
I agree Felicita 23 hrs ago #31
All we need to do then, is point out that they are social democrats. BComplex 3 hrs ago #272
I will refer you to post #2. Democrats are winning across the country because - Democrat stopdiggin 2 hrs ago #293
"Social Democrats" blubunyip 3 hrs ago #279
lol - and finally we get to the point. TBF 2 hrs ago #294
It's the damn purity tests. And I won't vote for this or that person because...... boston bean Yesterday #7
Purity testing has been the bane of Democrats. Lategame Yesterday #13
The " no purity test" talking points angrychair 23 hrs ago #41
Umm no. No no no no. boston bean 23 hrs ago #54
100%. Thank you. Democrats need to stop blaming others for past failures and adapt to realities. For God's sake, we KPN 21 hrs ago #154
It not the discussion we are talking about creeksneakers2 21 hrs ago #160
Calling for party loyalty isn't a purity test... it's basic political math. QueerDuck 3 hrs ago #273
Yes, we "vagina voters." How dare we vote for HRC and VP Harris? mcar 22 hrs ago #110
Importantly shore up Social Security as part of a platform. Prairie_Seagull Yesterday #24
T H I S ! ! ! Cosmocat 2 hrs ago #287
Too many words. I am sorry but you will say all of these and your listeners eyes will glaze over question everything 23 hrs ago #33
I was listing the policies the Social Democrats are pushing (as are most Democrats), not a campaign slogan. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #43
The problem is not capitalism Soul_of_Wit 23 hrs ago #47
I would add to that the: Corruption, Cruelty and Chaos!! Ars Longa 20 hrs ago #165
My Economics Professor Who Was A Republican BlueKota 16 hrs ago #233
Vulture Capitalism blubunyip 3 hrs ago #281
I hate capitalism I_UndergroundPanther 20 hrs ago #187
DSA is not a political party Soul_of_Wit 23 hrs ago #45
Looking at it as a big tent is the way for the Dem party to thrive. yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #136
Recommended! hamsterjill 23 hrs ago #46
The hardest part isn't the messaging, it's the money mdbl 23 hrs ago #68
Your point is valid. hamsterjill 22 hrs ago #98
Welcome to the Old Farts Club mdbl 6 hrs ago #261
lol SonOfNebanaube 3 hrs ago #280
The purity tests should end with the primaries mdbl 23 hrs ago #80
SELF destructive. And really ignorant. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #103
+1 leftstreet 14 hrs ago #243
Yes, it is just a word. But it's a word that the right will stroke into a frenzy. hadEnuf 5 hrs ago #264
Just "Democrats." We don't need to change our name bc his mouth spewed something. Scrivener7 4 hrs ago #266
No name change, just a clarification of the truth. hadEnuf 4 hrs ago #268
"A word the right will stroke into a frenzy"....like every other word they stroke into a BComplex 3 hrs ago #274
Neither of us know who this country will or won't elect -misanthroptimist Yesterday #3
Because "democrats" didn't vote democratic or didn't vote due to progressive purity. boston bean Yesterday #6
You're sick of people voting their conscience? -misanthroptimist Yesterday #11
Yes their pure conscience helped bring us us mango Mussolini. boston bean Yesterday #15
Really? -misanthroptimist Yesterday #22
The two times we lost we had coronations. Gore1FL Yesterday #26
Or women candidates Blaukraut Yesterday #29
And many who supported Sanders in 2016 voted for Trump. Both offered the same thing question everything 23 hrs ago #37
Only those lacking a BS detector would equate Sanders and Donald (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 23 hrs ago #42
Not today. But in 2016 many did question everything 23 hrs ago #44
And they lacked a BS detector in 2016 (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 23 hrs ago #62
How many? Link to a poll, please (nt) muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #82
You can read up on it here. sheshe2 21 hrs ago #137
Thank you. My cynicism was wrong. (nt) muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #143
Not sure about that. AloeVera 18 hrs ago #215
Or you can read a real analysis which shows most of the Trump voters who supported Sanders in Nanjeanne 5 hrs ago #265
Bernie lost the primary because the democratic party wouldn't let him participate in BComplex 3 hrs ago #276
Analyzing how Bernie Sanders supporters voted in the 2016 General Election by Brian Schaffner, Tufts University question everything 20 hrs ago #181
Post removed Post removed 23 hrs ago #73
Her name is Hillary. mr715 23 hrs ago #77
Also I think if you arent personal friends with somebody, referring to them by their last name is proper SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #84
I prefer Secretary and Senator Clinton. mr715 23 hrs ago #89
Truth SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #91
Huh? TVguyCards 21 hrs ago #147
Sanders: "they turned to Trump because Trump said things that made sense." betsuni 20 hrs ago #176
I do not believe that either Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris lost. yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #149
YES!! Yellow dahlia nailed it! BComplex 3 hrs ago #278
Thanks, BC. I have paid so much attention to these two elections since November 2016, yellow dahlia 2 hrs ago #290
And it freaks me out to this day that democrats weren't shouting this from the rafters! BComplex 1 hr ago #296
Exactly! In 2016 I read an article that raised the alarm about the election results, yellow dahlia 1 hr ago #302
That is simply false mcar 22 hrs ago #115
I agree with you that the nomination should not have been stolen from Bernie. yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #145
The DNC did not rig anything. creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #174
Sanders: "I wouldn't use the word rigged, because we knew what the rules were -- but what betsuni 19 hrs ago #213
That interview w/ Bernie was before the leaked emails that were revealed in July and November 2016. yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #221
Sanders: "If they went into our emails I'm sure there would be statements that would betsuni 13 hrs ago #249
I never said Bernie said there was rigging, but others of us did. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #253
What are you talking about? mcar 17 hrs ago #220
This is what I am talking about. yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #222
That didn't change the popular vote iemanja 15 hrs ago #236
The DNC conspired so that Bernie wouldn't get the nomination, in the primary. yellow dahlia 15 hrs ago #240
She got the popular vote in the primary iemanja 14 hrs ago #244
The primaries and nomination involve more than just the popular vote. yellow dahlia 14 hrs ago #246
I've stated the facts iemanja 14 hrs ago #248
The super - delegates are not determined by the will of the people - on the contrary. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #250
"Sanders could not have possibly won the nomination after May 3 -- at that point, he needed 984 betsuni 12 hrs ago #259
Hillary Clinton received 3.7 million more votes than Bernie Sanders Quiet Em 13 hrs ago #252
It's about the Super - Delegates. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #254
It was fair. It wasn't even close. Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #255
Yes the lawsuit was thrown out, due to lack of standing. The judge said the DNC did indeed undermine yellow dahlia 12 hrs ago #256
The people did pick the nominee. Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #258
It's called voting. Conspiracy theories about rigging and plots oppressing "victims" is a problem. betsuni 20 hrs ago #186
We lost the Supreme Court because of that "purity". "Conscience" is not the same thing lostincalifornia 23 hrs ago #67
The Supreme Court WAS lost due to "purity testing" - just not the way you think. AloeVera 19 hrs ago #206
I disagree with your use of the word "fact". yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #139
Best evidence possible creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #182
The article does not say that Democrats were driven by conscience, and so pissed off that Bernie didn't get the yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #197
Its not the only time it ever happened creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #199
The point I'm making is - bitter Dems DID NOT cost Hillary Clinton the election. yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #201
I've never seen any evidence of any election fraud. creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #203
That is not the primary point. The NPR article DID NOT claim that bitter Dems cost Hillary Clinton the election. yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #209
fine creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #211
NOT a "fact". The republican media brought us to this place, plus billionaires BComplex 3 hrs ago #275
I have to agree with boston bean in that I'm sick of people on our side not understanding what a vote actually is. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #49
You're going to be sick a long time -misanthroptimist 23 hrs ago #58
Require Civics class in high school. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #99
There are limits -misanthroptimist 22 hrs ago #123
Michigan voters who didn't vote chose a bus that took them to Wyoming then blew up with them inside it. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #125
Hypothetically -misanthroptimist 21 hrs ago #132
When that situation arises, we can talk about it. Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #135
Then it wouldn't be hypothetical, right? -misanthroptimist 21 hrs ago #141
You do you. Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #142
I'm irrelevant -misanthroptimist 21 hrs ago #144
I hope they take a good look at the result of their choice creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #185
Some will -misanthroptimist 19 hrs ago #195
I hope so. creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #196
Good analogy. I'm in 100% agreement. oasis 23 hrs ago #66
But if 100% of the growth is in the suburbs, maybe it's time to extend the circle line. meadowlander 23 hrs ago #79
The OP is about something happening now, not "people on our side not understanding what a vote actually is" muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #90
I'm concerned about future ones. Because it has happened in every previous one I can think of. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #100
So you're happy with a pre-emptive "fuck the other people on the left" OP? muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #105
I don't really know what you're on about. No, I'm not refighting anything. And that's not how I read the OP. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #107
"Because it has happened in every previous one I can think of" muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #112
Oh it's refighting? It's not just recalling or what one calls remembering? boston bean 21 hrs ago #151
Yes, when you accuse your opponents of "cannibalizing" the party, muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #156
Some comprehension would be very helpful here. boston bean 21 hrs ago #158
Some meaningful writing in the OP would have been very helpful. muriel_volestrangler 20 hrs ago #161
Nope. 👎 boston bean 20 hrs ago #180
The bus, however, should be free mr715 22 hrs ago #96
It is! That's the beauty! Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #101
That's the best description I've seen buzzycrumbhunger 22 hrs ago #108
Love this analogy! mcar 22 hrs ago #116
Well done! A very apt analogy! Abolishinist 19 hrs ago #198
I voted my conscience in 2016 and 2024 mcar 22 hrs ago #114
And I respect your views -misanthroptimist 22 hrs ago #127
The people who desert us keep saying that creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #166
How can they ignore the 5 million people who are losing health care creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #171
You are indeed free to give you opinion -misanthroptimist 20 hrs ago #173
I've never changed a mind creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #177
Aren't you advocating for more of the same? Renew Deal 22 hrs ago #113
Obama was exceptional. Clinton was highly competent BUT had both sides dragging her down, ALONG WITH RandomNumbers Yesterday #21
If, in 2006, someone had said... -misanthroptimist Yesterday #27
Then you don't remember it well angrychair 23 hrs ago #51
I didn't know about PUMAS. I learn something every day. yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #159
But Clinton herself supported Obama after the primary. Very soon after, RandomNumbers 2 hrs ago #284
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Yesterday #4
See ya bye orangecrush Yesterday #8
Ya think? boston bean Yesterday #9
The vocal far left from the big cities is the voice we get labeled with and costs us votes. Melon Yesterday #10
"Far left" Mysterian 22 hrs ago #124
There is a spectrum of beliefs within every party. Melon 21 hrs ago #129
There are no "far left" politicians in the Democratic party Mysterian 21 hrs ago #131
No. My beliefs have been very similar since post college with slight adjustments. Melon 21 hrs ago #138
According to your post #10, the spectrum in the Democratic party is all the way from "moderate" to "conservative" muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #140
Sorry...typing on a tablet. Melon 21 hrs ago #148
Thanks - that makes sense (nt) muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #150
Why do you think a democratic socialist will be the nominee in 2028? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #12
I am baffled by your forgetfulness of recent history. boston bean Yesterday #14
Party unity isn't achieved by the left acquiescing to the centrists Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #23
I don't see how affordability creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #188
I voted for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton Soul_of_Wit 23 hrs ago #38
Which self identified democratic socialist has announced a run for president? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #16
What? boston bean Yesterday #17
A quote from the OP, which you wrote: muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #20
I haven't seen AOC tear the party down creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #190
That might be what's behind the OP muriel_volestrangler 19 hrs ago #204
I think its about what is going on right here. creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #205
Not just for that creeksneakers2 15 hrs ago #237
That's a lot of "what ifs" for people to be "sick of this fucking shit" over 2 years before (nt) muriel_volestrangler 15 hrs ago #242
Not terribly unlikely ones though. creeksneakers2 14 hrs ago #245
I don't think she could win as president in 2028. She could win US Senate. LeftInTX 17 hrs ago #232
They said she might try that. creeksneakers2 15 hrs ago #238
I recommend Xanax. mr715 Yesterday #18
Yep, centrism works so well. Oh wait... orthoclad Yesterday #19
How do we taste? You're the one doing the cannibalizing. mr715 Yesterday #25
I was going to ask what wine i pair best with n/t gay texan 23 hrs ago #69
You are a Texan? mr715 23 hrs ago #75
Yes! N/t gay texan 23 hrs ago #76
Chianti. AloeVera 22 hrs ago #117
Gracious! H2O Man Yesterday #28
Agreed. The midterms are crucial. We need to save Democracy. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #162
Some people are addicted to the drama. Same as it ever was. demmiblue 5 hrs ago #262
Well said Auggie 23 hrs ago #30
Can you explain what "this shit" is, then? muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #34
Suspect it's Mamdani-backed candidates winning in the New York primaries meadowlander 23 hrs ago #39
I agree with " we should be running the candidate that can win the district" muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #63
It's "we get smeared with the views of the most extreme amongst us" meadowlander 23 hrs ago #70
I agree with you. I'm hoping that someone who recommended the OP muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #78
Shit that is going on creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #194
Thank you for being specific. muriel_volestrangler 19 hrs ago #207
Wasn't the case before creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #210
Word! yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #163
Kamala is talking with Mamdani creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #191
I never said "this shit." The OP did. Auggie 23 hrs ago #85
You said the OP was "well said" muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #93
You are wicked sharp orangecrush 21 hrs ago #146
Vote on policy duckworth969 23 hrs ago #32
"... contact the centrist of your choice..." Shipwack 23 hrs ago #83
Kudos to you for understanding nuance. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #164
Nope creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #214
"... contact the centrist of your choice..." Shipwack 23 hrs ago #86
And there it is. Exactly what I speak of. boston bean 21 hrs ago #130
Yet another OP attacking progressives angrychair 23 hrs ago #35
I'm a progressive and I very much agree with OP. W_HAMILTON 23 hrs ago #55
The OP is largely refering to primary challenges. Not whether dems are supported. SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #59
The OP was talking about electing a president and not tearing down Democrats. W_HAMILTON 23 hrs ago #65
"Tearing down" seemed to mean being democratic socialist. And came with few specifics SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #71
That's not what they want angrychair 22 hrs ago #126
Right on! creeksneakers2 19 hrs ago #208
It is the website for you. SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #56
The forum needs you. We need all voices. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #167
The existential threat to labor and young people by AI and robotics in the next ten years meadowlander 23 hrs ago #36
THIS gay texan 23 hrs ago #74
Hear! Hear! yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #168
Then after the primaries we should all pull together creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #216
I think of what popsdenver 23 hrs ago #40
I believe the destruction that followed the 2016 election is circumstantial evidence that yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #172
It is pathetic. Have we forgotten 2000, 2016, and 2024? We lost at those critical times lostincalifornia 23 hrs ago #48
Democratic voters are being influenced by third parties, such as the Green Party and Party for Socialism and Liberation. LeftInTX 17 hrs ago #231
"Destroy" becomes "transform" because it sounds nicer, but it means destroy and punish, ends justify the means. betsuni 11 hrs ago #260
I'm not saying it's right or wrong angrychair 15 hrs ago #235
People are told that Democrats aren't progressive -- labeling them establishment/centrist/corporatist, etc. . betsuni 23 hrs ago #52
Nobody in the Democratic party was talking about universal health care or raising the minimum wage before Bernie was. meadowlander 23 hrs ago #61
No. Ted Kennedy had been saying health care is a right, not a privilege since the '70s. betsuni 22 hrs ago #106
Right, except I was alive through all of those election cycles meadowlander 22 hrs ago #119
That's because its true creeksneakers2 18 hrs ago #218
And Hillary as First Lady fighting for universal healthcare. boston bean 17 hrs ago #226
She was responsible for the Children's Health Insurance Program too, which nobody seems to know. betsuni 15 hrs ago #241
Coalition building! yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #175
Really? sheshe2 19 hrs ago #192
I remember Hillary Clinton's proposals for universal healthcare. Nixie 22 hrs ago #102
Yes, new definition of universal health care is Medicare for All only as purity test. betsuni 21 hrs ago #128
++++ Nixie 18 hrs ago #217
Yep. mcar 22 hrs ago #118
Vermont was literally the reddest state in the country until it elected Bernie.And it still elects republicans regularly SSJVegeta 23 hrs ago #53
Oklahoma, Wyoming, Idaho, Louisiana etc would like a word. BannonsLiver 20 hrs ago #183
Um.Most of those states were blue when Bernie was elected in 1990 SSJVegeta 17 hrs ago #228
IMHO, Democrats overestimate everything about the voting public:..... ColoringFool 23 hrs ago #57
The focus should be on the GOP and not anyone of any persuasion that identifies as a Democrat. walkingman 23 hrs ago #60
Word! yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #134
Word! yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #179
thank you - I swear these threads are going to kill us TBF 15 hrs ago #234
K & R SunSeeker 23 hrs ago #64
"Your views aren't welcome unless you suppress them." David__77 23 hrs ago #72
Touch grass. Stacey Grove 23 hrs ago #87
Really! wolfie001 1 hr ago #298
America elected FDR to 4 terms IronLionZion 23 hrs ago #88
Good rant lefthandedskyhook 23 hrs ago #92
FIGHT OLIGARCHY usonian 22 hrs ago #94
my beef w them is the blatant antisemitism. mopinko 22 hrs ago #95
Netanyahu Gaza genocide of civilians is not acceptable DemocracyForever 20 hrs ago #184
propaganda. mopinko 19 hrs ago #193
Killing children is propaganda? DemocracyForever 19 hrs ago #202
Left Center Right dave99 22 hrs ago #97
Where did this come from? mcar 22 hrs ago #121
I agree larwdem 22 hrs ago #104
K&R mcar 22 hrs ago #109
Thanks for sharing the status quo position. Renew Deal 22 hrs ago #111
And we can't just sit by while the fucking Heritage Foundation takes a wrecking ball to our rights and freedoms. Initech 22 hrs ago #120
The ONLY winning strategy is voting blue in the general. Buddyzbuddy 22 hrs ago #122
I understand where you are coming from and feel/think we should call progressive Democrats, FDR Democrats. cksmithy 21 hrs ago #133
"Progressive" orangecrush 21 hrs ago #152
Calling someone an "FDR Democrat" is incredibly backward-looking muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #153
Yes a progressive is a good thing, all I said is a Democratic socialist, cksmithy 19 hrs ago #200
Have to agree blubunyip 1 hr ago #297
I'm personally a progressive, but also pragmatic. Despite what some people believe, we are basically a Raftergirl 21 hrs ago #155
Love your post!!! creeksneakers2 21 hrs ago #157
I remember people here saying Obama would never be elected Skittles 20 hrs ago #169
At my job the average age is about 27. Eko 20 hrs ago #170
I felt this way 25 years ago. Alice B. 4 hrs ago #267
+1 leftstreet 3 hrs ago #277
... demmiblue 20 hrs ago #178
The status quo isn't working DemocracyForever 20 hrs ago #189
If you see the political struggle in the US as Left vs Right then you are part of the PROBLEM Tim S 19 hrs ago #212
"Democratic Socialists recognize it and want change to rebalance things." Buddyzbuddy 17 hrs ago #230
People are eventually going to tire of MAGA policies EnergizedLib 17 hrs ago #219
Eventually? mr715 17 hrs ago #223
And do we need Florida to control Washington? EnergizedLib 17 hrs ago #224
We need Florida to at least partially sink into the sea... mr715 17 hrs ago #225
I'm watching the Michigan senate race. It looks like El-Sayed will win the primary. LeftInTX 17 hrs ago #227
It looks to me more and more that... WestMichRad 17 hrs ago #229
yup - and btw Skittles 15 hrs ago #239
I don't know if the Democratic Socialist brand is the right thing, but the candidates themselves are who will save us. Music Man 14 hrs ago #247
IMO the "socialist" label moondust 13 hrs ago #251
If this is about Chevalier, yeah, she has said some stupid shit in the past Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #257
Agree / disagree 4bonhoffer 5 hrs ago #263
Exactly. The fact that there is even discourse about whether or not the Democrats would be better than what we have now. madibella 4 hrs ago #269
The ratchet analogy is quite illustrative here Orrex 4 hrs ago #270
"I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat." krawhitham 3 hrs ago #282
Yadda, yadda, yadda. Here are some basic facts for you indusurb 2 hrs ago #283
And this post is not... nankerphelge 2 hrs ago #285
Sure, just hoist the white flag and accept the status quo. Scruffy1 2 hrs ago #286
We lost Bernie voters to the Idiot in Chief IbogaProject 2 hrs ago #288
Exactly agree! SamuelAdams 2 hrs ago #289
"Hamas slogans"? wolfie001 1 hr ago #301
Biden had much narrower Congressional majorities in his first two years because Soul_of_Wit 39 min ago #303
Socialism represents public power. Of course Republican and centrists are going to fight this. Fuck em! Emile 2 hrs ago #291
My Social Security check every month is Socialism and I'm still crying about it! Medicare too! wolfie001 1 hr ago #300
NO Chi67 2 hrs ago #295
..... wolfie001 1 hr ago #299
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We just fucking cannibali...»Reply #264