Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)

16. Same thing

Reply to FrenchieCat (Reply #10)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:02 PM

Jan 2012

I suspect, a bit like the Clinton cover photo (and a similar Coulter cover), that a very wide angle lens was being used, which changes proportions between very small differences in depth.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Superficial I know, but still..... [View all] FrenchieCat Jan 2012 OP

She is so gorgeous! n/t laruemtt Jan 2012 #1

No "but" about it zipplewrath Jan 2012 #2

Looks like her to me...... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #4

But not as she does in press photos. zipplewrath Jan 2012 #5

I don't get your point.... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #7

I'm not sure how much more clear zipplewrath Jan 2012 #13

Oh....... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #15

She angry black woman. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #25

Oh man, she's gorgeous, & you know what? dmr Jan 2012 #30

She looks "lighter" zipplewrath Jan 2012 #38

Are you suggesting that's not Michelle Obama on that magazine cover?...nt SidDithers Jan 2012 #41

How did you get that? zipplewrath Jan 2012 #42

I don't understand the standard in which you used to judge her pic..... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #43

Bad supposition zipplewrath Jan 2012 #45

The fact that you have to post so many times to FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #46

I was participating in the discussion zipplewrath Jan 2012 #52

From this... SidDithers Jan 2012 #44

wow zappaman Jan 2012 #48

No zipplewrath Jan 2012 #51

That picture is from a completely different angle and was taken in '08. renie408 Jan 2012 #32

Yup zipplewrath Jan 2012 #37

Cause it's a fucking "cover photo"....that's why! doh! FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #49

Yup zipplewrath Jan 2012 #50

I like her SO much! When I was deciding between Obama and Hillary, it was seeing Michelle saying gateley Jan 2012 #3

Oops. Composition error. progressoid Jan 2012 #6

Ok.... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #10

Same thing zipplewrath Jan 2012 #16

Much better ... progressoid Jan 2012 #17

I don't see anything Superficial about the topics she discusses in the issue MagickMuffin Jan 2012 #8

I'm smiling at your post..... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #23

It is NOT superficial JustAnotherGen Jan 2012 #9

I think the superficial part ... dawg Jan 2012 #14

Nice. Raffi Ella Jan 2012 #11

Stunning! Little Star Jan 2012 #12

Kick politicasista Jan 2012 #18

She's beautiful. LiberalAndProud Jan 2012 #19

Big ole kick... one_voice Jan 2012 #20

Lovely. whatchamacallit Jan 2012 #21

She is a lovely, smart, and sophisticated woman. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #22

most beautiful, caring and intelligent First Lady ever. Whisp Jan 2012 #24

Love her, that's it. a kennedy Jan 2012 #26

Don't blame you one bit! FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #27

That amazing blue dress! kaitcat Jan 2012 #28

She's as photogenic as lady diana. applegrove Jan 2012 #29

Thanks Frenchie. Scurrilous Jan 2012 #31

Not superficial at all. mmonk Jan 2012 #33

I am 100% an Obamabot. Michelle Obamabot that is. donheld Jan 2012 #34

superficiality is underrated Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #35

I really like Michelle. bigwillq Jan 2012 #36

Beautiful photo, but I like her message even better. PA Democrat Jan 2012 #39

I've never cared for Michelle... HipChick Jan 2012 #40

I've always liked her. TBF Jan 2012 #47