Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)

1. Are ALL beachfront properties owned by millionaires as a second property?

Reply to GP6971 (Original post)

Sat Jan 5, 2013, 09:26 PM

Jan 2013

I do agree that many people of lesser means had serious damage and destruction and voting against relief is wrong.

I am just asking about your assertion that beachfront properties are second homes owned by millionaires. I don't have a dog in this fight, but just wondering if that is true. Thanks and best wishes to your, and my, cousins who have been denied assistance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hurricane/ Superstorm Sandy. Young realize of course [View all] GP6971 Jan 2013 OP

Are ALL beachfront properties owned by millionaires as a second property? uppityperson Jan 2013 #1

There were a bunch of working class beach homes destroyed in Connecticut. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #2

Thank. My cousin makes $100,000/yr and inherited one also. Yes, makes a decent amount but not uppityperson Jan 2013 #3

In the towns of Bay Head and Mantaloking (sp) GP6971 Jan 2013 #4

Good rant and f them indeed. nt uppityperson Jan 2013 #5