Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Citizens United Correct? [View all]Tab
(11,093 posts)25. There's another thread somewhere
(and articles out on the Interwebs) where some guy was caught as the only person in a multi-person required carpool lane outside of L.A., but he's going to contest his ticket on the basis that he had articles of incorporation with him in the car and since "corporations are people too..." his car wasn't thus underoccupied.
He's flawed in his argument, of course, because that's not quite what Citizen's United conferred, but it should make for an interesting court transcript.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#13
" in an oppressive, authoritarian police state, you don't." No totally, not yet.
Lady Freedom Returns
Jan 2013
#47
You are stuck in semantics and theories while the facts are in your face.
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#56
Corporations, or any paper entity, are not people. Money is not speech.
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#21
One last kick to your attention seeking flame bait. "It falls short of an abomination" is only your
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#28
You are right. "An abomination" might not be all that much of a big deal...
reACTIONary
Jan 2013
#32
OK, it seems you really want to talk, my apologies for assuming that you were just
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#37
Actually, the ACLU said yes to a very narrow issue and the court ruled very broadly against
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2013
#51