General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judged now by loyalty to a political leader? No disagreement accepted. [View all]SunSeeker
(58,318 posts)The OP suggested Obama/the Dems had a "majority to fix it." The statement in the OP that is a lie is the following:
"...we in 2008 gave our party a majority to fix it. They had two years in which they could have turned around so many things, but they did not."
That is not true. A "majority to fix it" in this case would have a supermajority, not a simple majority. And as I noted to you up the thread, Dems had a supermajority in the Senate for only 24 days not 2 years, and on top of that, the period of supermajority was split into one 11-day period and one 13-day period. You appear to concede that point.
I am not calling any person a liar. I am just calling out a lie in an OP, a lie that has been spread by the right wing and even repeated on the left, as in this case, by well-meaning progressives. It's bs and I won't stand for it, even if it hurts someone's feelings.
It is ironic that my disagreement with a statement in the OP, an OP that laments the alleged "No disagreement accepted" attitude on DU, would be greeted by the OP poster and you with such tenacious opprobrium.