Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Just as ruthless and indifferent to the rule of law as his predecessor." Ouch. [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)52. Funny thing about that, Brennan once claimed "no civilians were killed
after 100's of drone missions".
It was later that we found out Brennan was deceiving us with skewed numbers based on the "all males were terrorists" theory of civilian body count.
Brennan was the cause of much of this disinformation. He also supported torture, since Obama chose this lying moraly challenged hack to head CIA, we can pretty well guess that more drone deaths, not less, will be a part of CIA policy in future.
Also
If we ever stopped torturing (well, we only outsource it now but..) we will have a CIA head that liked the "program" and will likely advocate for it's return, only so classified we will never hear of it this time around.
Still like this pick people?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
194 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Just as ruthless and indifferent to the rule of law as his predecessor." Ouch. [View all]
MadHound
Jan 2013
OP
Q: "If not drones, what?" A: NOT waging war on every continent on earth? Maybe? nt
Romulox
Jan 2013
#7
'If not drones, what'? Can you explain why we are killing people in all these countries?
sabrina 1
Jan 2013
#122
The difference is telling, Obama is far worse than even chimp regarding drones
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#59
invading Iraq, waterboarding and other torture of prisoners, warrantless surveillance
MotherPetrie
Jan 2013
#87
You just did. And of course, we get nothing but Republicans in charge of the military under
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2013
#93
The article describes how upsets Dems would be if Bush were doing the same thing.
JoePhilly
Jan 2013
#65
Well, considering how pissed off Dems and liberals were when Bush was taking these sort of actions,
MadHound
Jan 2013
#69
Well, let's see ... I was FOR invading Afganistan initially. I was AGAINST the invasion of Iraq
JoePhilly
Jan 2013
#99
Unfortunately, if the shoe fits he has to wear it. This, the patriot act and secrecy have been
arthritisR_US
Jan 2013
#75
Nobody needs to "wake up." Get over yourself-people disagree with you.
great white snark
Jan 2013
#100
I favor Drone strikes. I also want the more advanced Drones in the field asap because they
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#139
You are supposed to feel shame because Bush's use of Drones pissed you off ...
JoePhilly
Jan 2013
#146
LOL! I know Trying to call me a hypocrite here is really stupid, since I feel
NYC Liberal
Jan 2013
#149
Drone warfare is not going away. My prediction is that is how our country and other advanced
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#136
We should ban and melt down all guns, everywhere. Then move on to things that kill
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#140
True. But, being cremated by a Democratic drone is "not as bad" as one sent by a Republican.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2013
#143
The Obama administration considers all men of military age to be "suspected militants."
OnyxCollie
Jan 2013
#152
I dont even need to read the subject or body, I just see your username and know its a Obama=Bush OP
stevenleser
Jan 2013
#163
An absolute sickness of the soul grips many in our country who are shocked by children dying in a
grahamhgreen
Jan 2013
#181