General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Just as ruthless and indifferent to the rule of law as his predecessor." Ouch. [View all]truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)on a platter, they would stop attacking us.
I've read Islamic scholars to date the radicalization of Islam to our Adventures in Iran in 1953, when at the behest of the Brits we overthrew a democratically-elected socialist president and installed the Shah. In pursuit of cheaper oil of course. And because we could.
That's not the only time our protectors in the CIA have overthrown democratic socialist (horrors!) governments. They/we have ostensibly done it out of the fear of commies, but they really wanted to protect the profit margins of American (now multi-national) corporations (check out Kennecot Copper Company visavis Chile in 1973).
If we'd quit stomping on people, and trampling through their lives like a herd of stampeding elephants, they wouldn't attack us. (The Greatest Military Power the World has Ever Known? Why would they? For our freedomz?)
Sorry for the snark, but it seems painfully obvious to me.