General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If HRC runs in 2016, who should be the pro-worker, pro-peace, pro-justice candidate in the race? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)All I was talking about was what progressive candidate should run if she runs(since she's not progressive).
HRC is a centrist hawk, but she's not the same as Bush.
The point is, we shouldn't have to settle for just 50% different(and no real difference on foreign policy).
Do you have a problem with that assertion?
We aren't "a center-right country", and running under the assumption that we are(which is the only rationale for a HRC candidacy)is the same thing as giving up. Sure, we might win the presidency(although, with the RW haters she has, you'd have to admit, if you're at all honest, that she'd have just as tough time as anybody on the Dem Left), but it would be hollow like it was in the Nineties.
We don't have run self-denial candidacies anymore. We don't have to assume that most of the country is massively to our right.