I don't hold out much hope it is an investigative piece.
However, I could be wrong:
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/michelle_rhee_to_actually_be_held_accountable_by_press_for_once/
Michelle Rhee is the subject of tonights Frontline on PBS. Considering that Rhee, the former head of Washington, D.C.s schools, is one of the most deified figures in contemporary American politics, youd be forgiven for predicting another gauzy follow-up to Waiting for Superman, the pro-education reform propaganda picture that made Rhee a national figure. But this interview with the episodes lead reporter, John Merrow (via Dana Goldstein), suggests a much more critical take than Rhee is used to. Because unlike so many other outlets, Frontline is going to report on all the cheating.
3. Do you think the documentary will change anyones opinion of Rhee?
I dont think people know how strongly she resisted the investigation of the erasures. That might give some people pause. In Atlanta, the lead investigator told me that they considered three or more standard deviations from the norm to be a strong indication that cheating took place. In the district, there were classrooms that were five, six, seven deviations from the norm. Thats staggering. This is of course the evidence that was presented to Michelle Rhee.
However, take a look at the interview here:
http://www.edmediacommons.org/forum/topics/five-questions-for-pbs-newshour-correspondent-john-merrow-on-fron
This twerp actually thinks the New Orleans Recovery District is a "success" story.
Merrow is full of shit.