General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]loose wheel
(112 posts)That woman is some man's daughter, some men's grand daughter, maybe some man's niece, possibly some man's wife or mother. None of those men (as not the attacker) benefit from her rape and the assertion is absurd. A rapist is somebody using force to dominate somebody else, the rapist doesn't (generally) care about the fallout.
Societally, just the emotional and psychological issues that might result from the rape, beyond their personal cost to the woman, are expensive. The definite physical wounds can be much worse.
Most men are not rapists. They don't want to force themselves on anyone. If every rape that was reported in the US in 2010 were committed by a different man, then 1 in 20 would be rapists. However, rapists are serial offenders. Usually one rapist is responsible for multiple rapes, meaning that the 1 in 20 number is probably skewed to a higher percentage than it should be.
What does this mean to a guy that's not a rapist? He gets grouped in with guys that are. It means that the guy who is walking his drunk (female) friend back to her apartment so she can sleep it off gets looked at by others. It means the guy who is actually trying to flirt and being damned awkward (awful) about it gets looked at as a rapist. It means that a guy that had a few beers and wakes up next to a woman who also had a few drinks the night before is assumed to be a rapist. None of it is a benefit to the far larger portion of men.