Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Couple to be fined $500 a day for having a garden [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)95. Yes, I've seen this video game quality landscape installed in woodland areas. Out of staters move in
and complain while living next to a forest that deer ate something... in conversations, you find that they came from arid locations that didn't have diverse woodlands and wildlife.
I kept wanting to say, if you didn't want to have trees on your property or the wildlife whose habitat those created, why did you move here...
The newer subdivisions have big houses on hills they clear cut, all with these Mario Brothers yards, that they nevr go outside to see anyway, as they while away their lives indoors.
I see this more as a home association idocracy, and a bit of snobbery. The garden is rustic and atractive to one class of people, but just too 'poor' to some.
Saw the same thing in rural areas taken over the nouveau riche, who object to the yard sales, fruit stands, roadside memorials and small businesses along the road to their mansions. They want to control everything, and they run out those they consider who don't belong.
And if the runoff from previously forested hills flood the people who lived there longer in the plains, they could care less.
I've seen local city councils move up to be with them and ignore what is happening below, just as they do in third world countries. They vote to close down parks, community centers, public transportation and everything else that held the older, now 'lower class' communities together.
Prosperity is a two-edged sword. Everyone wants some of it, but those who get is don't always respect how they got it. Then when they get it, they add religion or poltiical theories to say why they should not pay taxes or do anything but profit off the rest of the people in their area.
That home looks like a modest 'starter home,' as they were once called. Many people, myself included, at this juncture in our economy would find that to be a palace. But the class war goes on and people wear blinders to that.
These stories are typically spun as government oppression by teabaggers for their purposes, but they are simply enacting the will of those who voted for such laws. And while they scream against this, they still enable it.
I doubt if they'll ever be able to collect this fine, but I've seen wealthy newcomers shut down businesses that had existed for many decades and provided small town employment because it didn't match the aesthetics the rich wanted to see on their drive home.
Notably, these are usually in Republican strongholds. They accuse goverment when it's their 'neighbors' who want them gone.
I kept wanting to say, if you didn't want to have trees on your property or the wildlife whose habitat those created, why did you move here...
The newer subdivisions have big houses on hills they clear cut, all with these Mario Brothers yards, that they nevr go outside to see anyway, as they while away their lives indoors.
I see this more as a home association idocracy, and a bit of snobbery. The garden is rustic and atractive to one class of people, but just too 'poor' to some.
Saw the same thing in rural areas taken over the nouveau riche, who object to the yard sales, fruit stands, roadside memorials and small businesses along the road to their mansions. They want to control everything, and they run out those they consider who don't belong.
And if the runoff from previously forested hills flood the people who lived there longer in the plains, they could care less.
I've seen local city councils move up to be with them and ignore what is happening below, just as they do in third world countries. They vote to close down parks, community centers, public transportation and everything else that held the older, now 'lower class' communities together.
Prosperity is a two-edged sword. Everyone wants some of it, but those who get is don't always respect how they got it. Then when they get it, they add religion or poltiical theories to say why they should not pay taxes or do anything but profit off the rest of the people in their area.
That home looks like a modest 'starter home,' as they were once called. Many people, myself included, at this juncture in our economy would find that to be a palace. But the class war goes on and people wear blinders to that.
These stories are typically spun as government oppression by teabaggers for their purposes, but they are simply enacting the will of those who voted for such laws. And while they scream against this, they still enable it.
I doubt if they'll ever be able to collect this fine, but I've seen wealthy newcomers shut down businesses that had existed for many decades and provided small town employment because it didn't match the aesthetics the rich wanted to see on their drive home.
Notably, these are usually in Republican strongholds. They accuse goverment when it's their 'neighbors' who want them gone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm guessing it really means... "Perfectly flat, perfectly green, perfectly manicured grass"...
tridim
Jan 2013
#14
Yes, I've seen this video game quality landscape installed in woodland areas. Out of staters move in
freshwest
Jan 2013
#95
Agreed. In an area such as where I live, where nature abounds in diversity from native plants, they
freshwest
Jan 2013
#128
Maybe the internet publicity will lead to widespread financial support to fight
tblue37
Jan 2013
#85
So true, as every gardener knows. The only "finished" garden is a plastic one!
SunSeeker
Jan 2013
#92
It should be illegal for realtors to consider anything other than the value of the actual property
Occulus
Jan 2013
#111
are they planting edibles? if so, if I were a neighbor, I would be supernice to them, offer
niyad
Jan 2013
#34
Their garden looks finished to me. Guess having three SUV's parked in front is better...n/t
AndyA
Jan 2013
#44
heh, I think it takes seven years to a decade to realize the mature growth of many shrubs and plants
bigtree
Jan 2013
#49
Go to Google Maps 106 E Orlando st, Orlando FL, Street view See what yard looked like before
Fla Dem
Jan 2013
#54
Yes, the comments are fascinating... in a staring at a train wreck sort of way.
Silent3
Jan 2013
#101
Um, did anyone say they wanted to 'take' their garden? Or their house? I don't think so.
randome
Jan 2013
#109