General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No progressives should be demanding new elections in Venezuela due to Chavez' health... [View all]joshcryer
(62,331 posts)I would reevaulate my position if they actually brought substance to the table, but if all they have is nastiness, then what can I do?
You haven't said anything to change my mind, all you've done is insult me, and then somehow go on this defense of said insults acting as if insults are all that need be done. You already admitted you can't read Spanish and don't trust auto-translators (the auto-translate of that is atrocious, I admit, but mainly because the justice in question is a bumbling idiot and anyone who would say "Chavez is absent if Chavez declares he is absent" is a moron).
I take it "wrongly" that you are being nasty to me by comparing my simple statement to Orly Taitz? How the else fuck am I supposed to take it? It's not substantiative, it's admittedly drawn from ignorance, because you don't even care to verify what I say. No, I see it exactly what it is, ignorant nastiness in deluded defense of a corrupt system.
Nothing I have said is comparable to Taitz because Taitz makes shit up, I quoted the constitution, and I quoted the justice who said that idiocy. Taitz, like chavistas, relies on uncertainty, innuendo, and blatant lies, I simply state facts.