Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)

2. The White House is tone deft on this issue of high level women.

Reply to cal04 (Original post)

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 10:23 PM

Jan 2013

This is 2013. Having the same number of women in the White House as Bill Clinton did is fucking weak.

Some visible, high level women need to be appointed in the next few days or Obama will have created a big problem for democrats. There are plenty of capable women to choose from. I favored Diane Feinstein over Kerry once Rice's potential nomination ran into trouble.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

White House defends its record of women in leadership positions [View all] cal04 Jan 2013 OP

Unlike Republicans, Obama has nothing to prove in terms of TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #1

The White House is tone deft on this issue of high level women. bluestate10 Jan 2013 #2

Where on earth did you get that notion? ProSense Jan 2013 #3

You can't argue with stupid Tempest Jan 2013 #5

Oops, ProSense Jan 2013 #6

this was the news meme of the day...all networks, all day spanone Jan 2013 #4