Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are you 'angry' over the end of the payroll tax holiday? [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)83. it looks to me like DU is a bit of a weather vane
"we" point whichever way Obama's wind blows.
When Obama was pushing to extend the accursed payroll tax cut, it seemed like DU was all for it, and I was battling against it alone.
Now that Obama has refused to fight to extend it, scarcely a voice can be heard to praise it.
But now I feel sorta funny about it. I always hated it because it was regressive. Most of the benefits went to the top 20%. However, it was LESS regressive than the other Bush tax cuts that we kept. And because it was eliminated, that means that once again, Obama's betrayal means a tax increase for the average member of the bottom 20%.
Go figure.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No. A little sad that I will have to put off some discretionary purchases for another year.
slackmaster
Jan 2013
#3
Backstory: Some concern trolls were sent to DU by Rush Limbaugh to whine about it.
yardwork
Jan 2013
#9
Sadly, the post that started it all, although locked, was retweeted over 500 times.
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#60
No, but I wasn't crazy about its implementation in the first place, and took the beating
bullwinkle428
Jan 2013
#13
No but the fact that some people (not on DU) would be angry is as predictable as gravity
Fumesucker
Jan 2013
#14
No. It was an ill conceived move, glad it's over. Let's go for a direct stimulus next time
alberg
Jan 2013
#36
Argh, I never intended for my comment to be used by the Washington Times to bash the president
democrattotheend
Jan 2013
#56
I wasn't mad because it was suppose to be temporary in the first place.
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#53
No. Because I'm an adult, and know that no "holiday" lasts for two years. We were....
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#61
it was meant as a temporary stimulative measure to help folks during the worst part of the
CTyankee
Jan 2013
#67
NO. It was only a temporary stimulus move. They (the president and congress) could have replaced
Filibuster Harry
Jan 2013
#77