Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are you 'angry' over the end of the payroll tax holiday? [View all]SheilaT
(23,156 posts)87. Well, I didn't notice any increase in my take-home
a couple of years ago, and I doubt I'll notice any decrease. For me, it'll be about six dollars a paycheck, which tells you how little I'm making these days. I also am paid hourly, and my exact hours vary from paycheck to paycheck, which is partly why I don't notice any difference.
I thought it was a very stupid thing to do back then, and I'm glad the tax holiday was ended. It would simply have been the first, easy step in the direction of eliminating Social Security entirely.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No. A little sad that I will have to put off some discretionary purchases for another year.
slackmaster
Jan 2013
#3
Backstory: Some concern trolls were sent to DU by Rush Limbaugh to whine about it.
yardwork
Jan 2013
#9
Sadly, the post that started it all, although locked, was retweeted over 500 times.
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#60
No, but I wasn't crazy about its implementation in the first place, and took the beating
bullwinkle428
Jan 2013
#13
No but the fact that some people (not on DU) would be angry is as predictable as gravity
Fumesucker
Jan 2013
#14
No. It was an ill conceived move, glad it's over. Let's go for a direct stimulus next time
alberg
Jan 2013
#36
Argh, I never intended for my comment to be used by the Washington Times to bash the president
democrattotheend
Jan 2013
#56
I wasn't mad because it was suppose to be temporary in the first place.
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#53
No. Because I'm an adult, and know that no "holiday" lasts for two years. We were....
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#61
it was meant as a temporary stimulative measure to help folks during the worst part of the
CTyankee
Jan 2013
#67
NO. It was only a temporary stimulus move. They (the president and congress) could have replaced
Filibuster Harry
Jan 2013
#77