General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In 1966 I was trained with the M-14. I was taught [View all]OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)Your OP attacks a style of gun that is literally responsible for probably less than 2% of gun homicides. And using FBI statistics, we know that they cant be responsible for more than about 3.5%.
If you could somehow draft legislation so effective that it removes ALL assault-style rifles from America while still being constitutional... it physically could not reduce homicides more than the paltry 2% or so that they are responsible for. And even that assumes that substitute weapons would not be used in lieu of the contraband assault-style rifles. People need to critically THINK about this issue and realize that no matter how effective they are at banning these scary looking rifles, the measure cannot be significantly effective at reducing gun homicide. The measure is literary a failure before it's even implemented - DOA. It's a feel-good measure, nothing more.
I would think that people REALLY tired of all the gun deaths would want REAL results. That is why I support support laws that actually have a chance at making a difference.