General Discussion

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)

11. That's understandable.

Thu Jan 10, 2013, 06:42 PM

Jan 2013

I would like any candidate to recognize that there are both (1) Democrats that advocate against the private ownership of firearms as well as (2) a significant number of Democrats who privately own firearms whether they are advocates or not.

The 2012 Democratic Platform seemed to recognize this.

Unless I'm mistaken, there is an effort being made to stampede politicans to disregard that there are firearm-owning Democrats whose views may not coincide with the views of the advocates against the private ownership of firearms.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cuomo Turns Hard Left [View all] babylonsister Jan 2013 OP

He's the candidate I will support in the primaries. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jan 2013 #1

Based on your moniker, if sincere, you should be informed that his economic views are exactly AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #3

He's got 2.5 years to keep it up. sadbear Jan 2013 #4

Why would you say that when you don't even know who is running? A Simple Game Jan 2013 #7

He's "a fiscal conservative" instead of a Keynesian Democrat? But his anti-Keynesian view AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #2

About point 1 JVS Jan 2013 #10

That's understandable. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #11

The underlying article gives useful context about Cuomo's past conservatism Jim Lane Jan 2013 #5

Fracking hedgehog Jan 2013 #6

+1 joeybee12 Jan 2013 #9

Not buying it. He's economically right wing and that disqualifies him in my book. JVS Jan 2013 #8

You think that from his RANT blasted over airwaves about Gun Control? KoKo Jan 2013 #12

Hmph.. I didn't even know he went to Damascus n/t Fumesucker Jan 2013 #13

c'mon in andrew, the water's fine... spanone Jan 2013 #14