General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In 1966 I was trained with the M-14. I was taught [View all]OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)Nobody is quibbling about terminology here. Bringing up a firearm's historical usage in homicide is germane to a discussion aimed at decreasing homicide. I'm merely pointing out that someone aimed at significantly decreasing gun homicides who has set their sights on assault-style rifles is acting counter productively.
Pretty much every type of gun was originally designed for use in war. Muskets, Lever actions, mag-fed bolt actions, semi-autos... spears, bows,, blades, clubs... they were all modern weapons of war at some point of history. So the real quation is who gets to be the self-proclaimed righteous arbiter of which weapons demostrate a sick twisted culture. I'm guessing you're applying to the open position for moral arbiter of allowable weapons?
A number of people who have (and are currently) experiencing war firsthand support the ownership of these assault-style rifles (when they return home, of course). Do these people who have "found out what it's like for real" get to keep them?