Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)This Is BIG (Think Of the Implications): 'California in Surplus' - Paul Krugman/NYT [View all]
California in SurplusPaul Krugman - NYT
January 11, 2013, 9:00 am
Guess whose state budget crisis seems to be over?
As best I understand it, whats going on in CA is a microcosm (a pretty big microcosm, actually maybe more of a mesocosm or something?) of whats going on at the national level. A severely depressed economy led to big deficits, because tax receipts are strongly affected by the state of the economy indeed, are almost certainly much more cyclical than they used to be.
In response to those deficits, there was a lot of spending reduction plus some more modest efforts to increase revenue. And now that we have the beginnings of real recovery, its turning out that those efforts were enough to remove much if not all of the structural, as opposed to recession-driven, deficit.
As this reality becomes more obvious, the deficit scolds will of course go wild. They have staked their careers on crusading against supposedly intractable deficits, and they have their hearts (and more important, their wallets) set on exploiting the alleged fiscal crisis to dismantle social insurance programs. Good news will be a blow to everything they want, and will be furiously and vigorously denied.
But once again: deficits are receding as an issue before our eyes.
As best I understand it, whats going on in CA is a microcosm (a pretty big microcosm, actually maybe more of a mesocosm or something?) of whats going on at the national level. A severely depressed economy led to big deficits, because tax receipts are strongly affected by the state of the economy indeed, are almost certainly much more cyclical than they used to be.
In response to those deficits, there was a lot of spending reduction plus some more modest efforts to increase revenue. And now that we have the beginnings of real recovery, its turning out that those efforts were enough to remove much if not all of the structural, as opposed to recession-driven, deficit.
As this reality becomes more obvious, the deficit scolds will of course go wild. They have staked their careers on crusading against supposedly intractable deficits, and they have their hearts (and more important, their wallets) set on exploiting the alleged fiscal crisis to dismantle social insurance programs. Good news will be a blow to everything they want, and will be furiously and vigorously denied.
But once again: deficits are receding as an issue before our eyes.
Link: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/california-in-surplus/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto
.
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Is BIG (Think Of the Implications): 'California in Surplus' - Paul Krugman/NYT [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2013
OP
Maybe you and other voters need to vote in a democratic super-majority, that seems to be
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#5
We have a pretty ugly democratic majority. We have some very crooked dems in our state. It's sad.
mucifer
Jan 2013
#10
We simply told the wealthy carpetbaggers that if they want to enjoy California's beaches and
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#42
Maybe non Californians need to take a loot at the state political landscape
Lordquinton
Jan 2013
#37
Here in TN we have a RepubliCON super majority and in Greene County a 12.6% unemployment rate
fasttense
Jan 2013
#72
Looks so. Brown made some hard choices early on. Now that California is getting on it's feet,
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#7
The Occupy movement in California had a lot of sympathy from middle-class city dwellers.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#43
One only has to point out the infamous Cheney quote if they ask for proof of that!
bullwinkle428
Jan 2013
#6
LOL !!! - Youngie !!! - The First Vote I Ever Cast After Turning 18, Was For Jerry Brown In 1974 !!!
WillyT
Jan 2013
#56
and the top earners will whine and cry per usual...but who cares, whiners whine
Follow The Money
Jan 2013
#12
The Scandanavian countries have very high tax rates, but their economies are thriving and their
Flatulo
Jan 2013
#63
I see that they also have limited trade with China. Outsourcing your manufacturing base
Flatulo
Jan 2013
#81
How many public servants and retired public servants were screwed over to do it?
forestpath
Jan 2013
#50
they'll just have to create another 9-11, er, another Pearl Harbor, as PNAC put it,
valerief
Jan 2013
#75