Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Impact of Assault Weapons Ban - Illustration- [View all]Robb
(39,665 posts)8. Down from when, my cherry-picking friend? And where?
http://www.ojp.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2011/BJS_PR-111611.pdf
HOMICIDES FALL TO LOWEST RATE IN FOUR DECADES
WASHINGTON The nations homicide rate fell to 4.8 homicides per 100,000 U.S. residents in 2010,
its lowest level in four decades, the Bureau of Justice Statistics announced today. Much of the decline
was in the nations largest cities, those with a population of one million or more, where the homicide
rate dropped dramatically from 35.5 homicides per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1991 to a low of 11.9 per
100,000 in 2008.
The sharp increase in homicides from the mid-1980s through the early 1990s, and much of the
subsequent decline, is attributable to gun violence by teens (age 14 to 17) and young adults (age 18 to
24). Despite the recent decline, the number of gun homicides committed by teens and young adults in
2008 remained similar to the counts of the mid-1980s.
Most murders were intraracial. From 1980 through 2008, 84 percent of white homicide victims were
murdered by whites and 93 percent of black victims were murdered by blacks. During this same period,
blacks were disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders. Blacks were six
times more likely than whites to be homicide victims and seven times more likely than whites to commit
homicide.
The number of homicides known to involve adult or juvenile gang violence has quadrupled since 1980,
increasing from about 220 homicides in 1980 to 960 homicides in 2008. From 1980 to 2008, gang
violence increased from one percent to six percent of all homicides. During this same period, gun
involvement in gang-related homicides increased from 73 percent to 92 percent.
WASHINGTON The nations homicide rate fell to 4.8 homicides per 100,000 U.S. residents in 2010,
its lowest level in four decades, the Bureau of Justice Statistics announced today. Much of the decline
was in the nations largest cities, those with a population of one million or more, where the homicide
rate dropped dramatically from 35.5 homicides per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1991 to a low of 11.9 per
100,000 in 2008.
The sharp increase in homicides from the mid-1980s through the early 1990s, and much of the
subsequent decline, is attributable to gun violence by teens (age 14 to 17) and young adults (age 18 to
24). Despite the recent decline, the number of gun homicides committed by teens and young adults in
2008 remained similar to the counts of the mid-1980s.
Most murders were intraracial. From 1980 through 2008, 84 percent of white homicide victims were
murdered by whites and 93 percent of black victims were murdered by blacks. During this same period,
blacks were disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders. Blacks were six
times more likely than whites to be homicide victims and seven times more likely than whites to commit
homicide.
The number of homicides known to involve adult or juvenile gang violence has quadrupled since 1980,
increasing from about 220 homicides in 1980 to 960 homicides in 2008. From 1980 to 2008, gang
violence increased from one percent to six percent of all homicides. During this same period, gun
involvement in gang-related homicides increased from 73 percent to 92 percent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
but there were fewer sold and high capacity magazines were not being sold
Motown_Johnny
Jan 2013
#25
The fact that the number after the ban expired is more than twice what it was before the ban...
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#3
Question- How many of those killings involved assault weapons? Were there more incidents or larger
KittyWampus
Jan 2013
#15
All you did is highlight that a subsection of one age group shifted.You didn't refute anything.
KittyWampus
Jan 2013
#16
Info on types of guns used in mass shootings. Interesting. Not wanting to argue with anyone
KittyWampus
Jan 2013
#33
We could limit (even handgun) magazines to 6, but it only takes a split second to reload.
LAGC
Jan 2013
#38
And like second-hand smoke, extended responsibility for children in the home.
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#79
How many shootings involved assault weapons? Were there more incidents or larger body counts?
KittyWampus
Jan 2013
#18
This reaffirms my position that we need to address violence in general…not just guns
KittyWampus
Jan 2013
#23
Can you tell which one of these were banned? One of these were banned, and one was legal.
Separation
Jan 2013
#39
If you assume they are both functional semi-automatics, you can tell by looking
Recursion
Jan 2013
#60
and yet, i've had people posting the exact opposite stats over the past few weeks
samsingh
Jan 2013
#54
not more irrational than stockpiling weapons to fight the government in the event
samsingh
Jan 2013
#85
The graph is misleading, the bans are more at fault for this graph than the weapon is
madville
Jan 2013
#61
Graphs and statistics fail at the most basic of the idea of the cost of weapon mayhem.
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#83
Facts for our pro-NRA "pro gun progressives"* are like garlic to a vampire: but that chart is
apocalypsehow
Jan 2013
#92
So the fact that military style semi-automatic rifles were legal during the AWB is spin?
hack89
Jan 2013
#100
Facts for our pro-NRA "pro gun progressives"* are like garlic to a vampire: but that chart is
apocalypsehow
Jan 2013
#104
Ooohh...the poster still has problems with the reading portion of the reply(s). That's unfortunate.
apocalypsehow
Jan 2013
#109