Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NBC News: RFK Jr: 'Very convincing' evidence that JFK wasn't killed by lone gunman [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)116. Nice smear, zappaman. Lane, as an attorney, defended Liberty Lobby.
Lane proved to a jury that E Howard Hunt was in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963 as part of a CIA operation to kill President Kennedy.
He detailed his reasoning in "Plausible Denial," published in 1992. E Howard Hunt filed a defamation suit against a right wing mag that had named him as being in Dallas on company business. Victor Marchetti, then an assistant to Richard Helms, reported the agency was concerned the public would learn the truth. He confessed later to participating in the assassination on his deathbed.
What Mark Lane may best be known is "Rush to Judgement," a critique of the Warren Commission, published in 1966.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/319138.Rush_to_Judgment
I'm not surprised you don't seem to know any of that, zappaman.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NBC News: RFK Jr: 'Very convincing' evidence that JFK wasn't killed by lone gunman [View all]
NewsCenter28
Jan 2013
OP
I think there are conspiracy wackos, but the people who deny all conspiracies are even more wacko
Bjorn Against
Jan 2013
#40
You can disagree with someone without being shitty, you know--calling the poster a "rotting stump"
MADem
Jan 2013
#78
No, they don't, and RFK Jr is an ex-smackhead who also believes that vaccines cause autism
Spider Jerusalem
Jan 2013
#23
Wow. The guy you called 'Smackhead' puts together a controversial report on vaccines...
Octafish
Jan 2013
#35
Address the results of neutron activation analysis and trajectory reconstruction then.
Spider Jerusalem
Jan 2013
#42
Advances in forensic science have revealed both of your contentions to be wrong.
Octafish
Jan 2013
#44
So you have to wait ''years'' for me to explain that fraction of the Zapruder film, William Seger?
Octafish
Jan 2013
#137
So a fellow Democrat-one whose family has sacrificed so much for this nation-is a 'conspiracy kook'?
Octafish
Jan 2013
#50
Again you smear Mark Lane, zappaman, meaning you were only feigning ignorance.
Octafish
Jan 2013
#121
The lack of physical evidence contradicting the conclusions of the Warren Report is not surprising
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#105
"wishful thinking" that the "magic bullet" explanation would be believed - a convoluted theory. n/t
AnotherMother4Peace
Jan 2013
#17
Not true. There have been multiple confessions and a growing mountain of evidence.
alberg
Jan 2013
#56
People love the fun of thinking it was a huge cover up. More fun than the truth.
Logical
Jan 2013
#57
Try this -- How is JFK hit from the front as they drive AWAY from the book depository ?
KurtNYC
Jan 2013
#140
This means RFK would have conducted a different investigation if he had become President
Welcome_hubby
Jan 2013
#10
And the nuts love thinking it was a a cover up. Like 911, etc. People love stories. Not the truth.
Logical
Jan 2013
#60
The level of competition between organized elites is much higher than generally believed
FarCenter
Jan 2013
#25
Well, we get to hear from an eyewitness what Attorney General Kennedy thought.
Octafish
Jan 2013
#41
I was quite young when Evers, JFK, MLK, RFK and others were murdered. This is a painful subject.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#96
The existence of posters that disagree with the OP is evidence that the conspiracy is correct?
cpwm17
Jan 2013
#136