Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(3,102 posts)

7. No. Because caving means giving in. And we already know that

Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:36 PM

Jan 2013

Obama wants to cut Social Security. So if he puts that on the table again, it isn't caving because it's something he already wants to do.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Krugman: WH tells him that it is absolutely, positively not going to cave [View all] cthulu2016 Jan 2013 OP

it is up to the boner to come up with a bill Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #1

And he believes them? DJ13 Jan 2013 #2

Lets hope they do DJ13 Jan 2013 #6

Yes, why tip your hand in advance? truebluegreen Jan 2013 #10

Do you think the WH will cave?.. Stuart G Jan 2013 #3

No. Because caving means giving in. And we already know that forestpath Jan 2013 #7

+100 Myrina Jan 2013 #11

Ah, but Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #16

This is what's wrong with DU now elias7 Jan 2013 #18

You may be right. dawg Jan 2013 #14

Krug has a pretty low definition of what constitutes caving bluestateguy Jan 2013 #4

I don't recall PK calling the final cliff deal a cave. dawg Jan 2013 #15

They don't cave, they do as they intend. TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #8

Cave?... NO. They will just call it something else. bvar22 Jan 2013 #9

I am glad that the President is taking a principled stand... humbled_opinion Jan 2013 #12

I hope so but I've heard that many, many times before. Kablooie Jan 2013 #19