General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MENTALLY ILL MENTALLY ILL MENTALLY ILL [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)10 mentally ill people is far easier -- and less invasive as far as civil liberties are concerned -- than trying to police 80 million-plus law-abiding people as criminals.
I don't understand the so-called progressive need to treat people like criminals but treat criminals like people where guns are concerned. It's not constitutional, it's not politically viable and it isn't even practical. If even 10% of the gun owners are willing to go rogue then that means you have 8 million new criminals for a criminal "justice" system that is near broken already.
We can't even stem the tide of drugs like meth and crack why would we think that people who plan their rampages to include pipe bombs, booby traps and body armor wouldn't go to illicit sources? Chicago has a near total ban and yet it is the gun murder capital of America. More people are murdered annually within the relatively constricted confines of that city than US service members were lost in years of fighting in Iraq. The criminals got guns, the illicit gun dealers got rich and good people like Otis McDonald got prosecuted because he was rich, white and well-connected like David Gregory.
Treating the mentally ill makes more sense logistically and in terms of civil liberties.