General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MENTALLY ILL MENTALLY ILL MENTALLY ILL [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)That's self-defining. However, no one is claiming millions of people with mental health issues need to be criminalized. I've only ever heard the conversation refer to those people who were public threats. Holmes, Lanza, cho, Loughner and Hasan gave off plenty of warning signs and yet the authorities either could not or would not intervene until it was too late.
Meanwhile, your cohort upthread wants to incarcerate and forcible "reeducate" millions of people for no crime at all, even though they have no mental health issues. No due process. No presumption of innocence. No opposing council. No hearing of evidence. No probable cause. No democratic process. They have been adjudicated as being guilty being a single, self-appointed authority.
But don't dare suggest a few dozen maniacs be treated as the threats they are. That would be unfair.