Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To our friends who claim they need guns to protect them from the Government [View all]Mr. Blue Sky
(33 posts)121. Battle of Athens - would you call this treason?
True story...
The Battle of Athens (sometimes called the McMinn County War) was a rebellion led by citizens in Athens and Etowah, Tennessee, United States, against the local government in August 1946. The citizens, including some World War II veterans, accused the local officials of political corruption and voter intimidation. The event is sometimes cited by firearms ownership advocates as an example of the value of the Second Amendment in combating tyranny.[citation needed]
Citizens of McMinn County had long been concerned about political corruption and possible election fraud.[1] The U.S. Department of Justice had investigated allegations of electoral fraud in 1940, 1942, and 1944, but had not taken action.[1][2] The wealthy Cantrell family essentially ruled the county. Paul Cantrell was elected sheriff in the 1936, 1938, and 1940 elections, and was elected to the state senate in 1942 and 1944, while his former deputy, Pat Mansfield, was elected sheriff.[1][2] A state law enacted in 1941 had reduced local political opposition by reducing the number of voting precincts from 23 to 12 and reducing the number of justices of the peace from fourteen to seven (including four "Cantrell men".[1] The sheriff and his deputies worked under a fee system whereby they received money for every person they booked, incarcerated, and released; the more arrests, the more money they made.[1] Buses passing through the county were often pulled over and the passengers were randomly ticketed for drunkenness, whether guilty or not.[1]
In the August 1946 election, Paul Cantrell was once again a candidate for sheriff, while Pat Mansfield sought the state senate seat.[1] After World War II ended, some 3,000 military veterans (constituting about 10 percent of the county population) had returned to McMinn County. Some of the returning veterans resolved to challenge Cantrell's political control by fielding their own nonpartisan candidates and working for a fraud-free election.[1] They called themselves the GI Non-Partisan League.[3] Veteran Bill White described the veterans' motivation:
There were several beer joints and honky-tonks around Athens; we were pretty wild; we started having trouble with the law enforcement at that time because they started making a habit of picking up GIs and fining them heavily for most anythingthey were kind of making a racket out of it. After long hard years of servicemost of us were hard-core veterans of World War IIwe were used to drinking our liquor and our beer without being molested. When these things happened, the GIs got madderthe more GIs they arrested, the more they beat up, the madder we got ...[1]
Combat veteran Knox Henry stood as candidate for sheriff in opposition to Cantrell.[1] In advertisements and speeches, the GI candidates promised an honest ballot count and reform of county government. At a rally, a GI speaker said,
The principles that we fought for in this past war do not exist in McMinn County. We fought for democracy because we believe in democracy but not the form we live under in this county.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To our friends who claim they need guns to protect them from the Government [View all]
DainBramaged
Jan 2013
OP
Once you shoot your first ATF- oder FBI-agent, you are gonna be an all-american hero.
DetlefK
Jan 2013
#1
I am yet to see that meme here or in real life. The closest I ever get is people concerned about
ProgressiveProfessor
Jan 2013
#2
If they're so concerned about the government coming to get them, why not cut military funding a bit?
ck4829
Jan 2013
#4
Apples and Oranges obviously. In those countries it was us against an entire country.
A Simple Game
Jan 2013
#14
you and your buddies that dispise [sic] the left are in a very vocal minority..
frylock
Jan 2013
#88
The main problem with this theory is that in those campaigns the US Still cared about most UN and
stevenleser
Jan 2013
#132
Today they're neocons. The same philosophy has existed for a long time under different names
jeff47
Jan 2013
#110
With the possible exception of Iraq, all of those were receiving material assistance from outside.
Adsos Letter
Jan 2013
#109
Also, if people hate their government it lets business do as they wish....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2013
#39
Big bidness is reducing government to the size they can hire their own thugs to do it.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#60
Their dream is to link business to government so talking back to your boss is Treason.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2013
#96
To be fair, what does that say of the original revolutionists? Were they wrong to revolt?
NYC_SKP
Jan 2013
#13
You can just drop that "willfully ignorant shit" right now, thank you. To continue...
NYC_SKP
Jan 2013
#21
People are free to, and may do, disagree. In fact, the 1% are doing just fine!
NYC_SKP
Jan 2013
#113
Thanks and welcome. I know that many good workers are unable to advocate publicly.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#56
People who hate the United States and don't want to be a part of it need to go live in another
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#92
How many guns do you need? Why do you need assault-type weapons or automatics and massacre magazines
DainBramaged
Jan 2013
#54
Sorry, but Jefferson thought a revolution may be necessary every 2 decades
Blue Palasky
Jan 2013
#58
Oddly, the government is engaging in treason against the American people and Democracy itself.
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#62
All true, with a footnote: the American people, on the sugar tit of capitalism, have ENABLED every
patrice
Jan 2013
#87
Those yahoos can go from SUPPORT OUR TROOPS to SHOOT OUR TROOPS in the blink of an eye
Martin Eden
Jan 2013
#84
"Our attachment to no nation upon earth should supplant our attachment to liberty."
One_Life_To_Give
Jan 2013
#86
All of which add up to "Better dead than __________" but if freedom means anything at all, wouldn't
patrice
Jan 2013
#93
One life to give is fine as long as you make it your own & don't coerce others into the very thing
patrice
Jan 2013
#94
If Freedom isn't free, you* are not the ONE to decide the terms of its consequences for anyone
patrice
Jan 2013
#97
Perhaps it doesn't matter to you that it appears our military, or police, could get involved in
patrice
Jan 2013
#100
I thought OP is flamebait. Can't take the heat? Quit mucking around in the kitchen.
patrice
Jan 2013
#102
Not "the thread" that I "want to be 'mucking around' in" - Is that somekind of threat? Will
patrice
Jan 2013
#124
explain? But then that wouldn't be "plain and simple" would it? Have your read this yet?
patrice
Jan 2013
#139
Yayayayayayayaya of course you folks are going to spew all kinds of examples that matters
DainBramaged
Jan 2013
#130