General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm Sorry... But I Gotta Ask... People Here Keep Saying We Have To Have The President's Back... [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"So if Bernie Sanders were elected President, and had to "cave" to a Democratic Congress, you would hold his feet to the fire, right, and never ever have his back?" You are making the assumption that "having his back" and "holding his feet to the fire" are mutually exclusive. They are not. Holding your Congressional representative's feet to the fire (asking them to honor their promises) is your obligation as a participating citizen. It would be nice after working to "support" a candidate and getting them elected one could relax and sit back and watch American Idol. But that isnt practical. As I see it, we choose a candidate that supports our values and then, once elected WE HELP THEM REMEMBER THAT THEY SUPPORT OUR VALUES.
As far as "having his back", I would say that I would have Pres Obama's back if he took the risk to strengthen SS by raising the cap. He would get a lot of resistance but I would "have his back". But I am guessing that your definition of "having his back" would mean that should he cut SS, you would support the decision irregardless of the reason. If I am wrong about that, please clarify.