Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:09 PM Jan 2013

Patrick Kennedy spouts nonsense on Amendment 64 (Legal Cannabis in Colorado) [View all]

Earlier this week I posted about Kennedy's alignment with David Frum (former Bush staffer) and their attempts to FORCE people who are found in possession of ANY amount of marijuana to go into a treatment program. SAM is the group he's shilling for.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022155872

Then Patrick went to Colorado to tell people there they didn't know what they were doing when they made their historic votes to legalize cannabis in November, 2011.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/opinion/2013/01/11/patrick-kennedy-spouts-nonsense-amendment-64/32000/

op in the Denver Post -

In Denver on Thursday, the former Rhode Island congressman and son of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, made an absurd claim. According to The Denver Post, he said marijuana legalization “slipped under the radar” both in Colorado and Washington and that organizations bent on countering the idea didn’t have time to mobilize. As a result, voters “didn’t know what their stake was in the debate.”

Kennedy is free to claim that Colorado voters didn’t understand the issues as well as they should, because that’s a matter of opinion. But “slipped under the radar”? Amendment 64 got huge amounts of publicity precisely because its favorable polling prompted the media to take it seriously.

...as Mason Tvert of the Marijuana Policy Project reminded me today, parts of Colorado have “been having a pretty significant discussion about marijuana policy” even longer, at least since “Denver became the first city in the world to approve a measure removing all penalties for marijuana possession” in 2005. Tvert estimates “there have literally been upwards of 1,000 print and TV news stories in the state [on policy affecting marijuana] in just the past few years.”

This was not an isolated claim by Kennedy, either. He earlier told the Boston Globe much the same thing in explaining why he was now committed to opposing pot legalization. “I can’t stand by and let this move forward without any kind of debate or questioning,” he said. “This thing could pass right underneath the radar and we will wake up one day and say what were we thinking?”

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22350842/former-congressman-patrick-kennedy-launches-sam-project-meets

Before former Rhode Island congressman Patrick Kennedy Jr. could introduce his new national initiative to educate the public and policymakers about the health risks of pot use, he was asked to step down as head of Smart Approaches to Marijuana.

"If Patrick Kennedy and his new organization want people to be educated about marijuana, he should start with himself," said Mason Tvert, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project and a leader in the successful campaign to legalize recreational pot use in Colorado . "The evidence is clear — marijuana is far less addictive and less harmful to the body than alcohol."

Tvert said that anyone attempting to be a public educator about the health risks associated with marijuana must openly and honestly address how much more dangerous legal controlled substances like alcohol and tobacco are to public safety.

"Like everyone else who woke up after Election Day and saw that (marijuana legalization) was moving fast in states like Colorado, I realized it looked as though the domino effect could move to other states quicker," Kennedy said. "I want to slow this train down and begin a discussion before other states rush to judgment."

So, Kennedy wants to pretend his actions are warranted because others are too stupid to know what they were doing. What a conservative pov - to think you know better and must force your view on others who disagree.

Again, I cannot state how ironic it is to have a kid whose inherited wealth rests upon smuggling alcohol attempt to prevent others from choosing another source of intoxication. Maybe his vision has been distorted. Maybe it's a problem with the northeastern US and their long association with alcohol via rum running, immigrants and urban life. Who knows. All I know is that this stance and action by Kennedy is a joke to anyone who has followed this issue for any length of time.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Patrick has his own drug of choice. Perhaps that industry is fronting him some aged stock. Scuba Jan 2013 #1
You know the alcohol industry was a big backer of the "war on drugs" RainDog Jan 2013 #4
Focus on your own drug demons, Patrick. Pot isn't among them. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #2
The anti marijuana people are mostly hypocrites and crazies. Anti science, usually 'former' abusers Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #3
Yep. Taverner Jan 2013 #9
Former addicts are often pretty black and white in their thinking RainDog Jan 2013 #15
Patrick Kennedy's caused the death of a young woman while under the influence of alcohol. Romulox Jan 2013 #5
why don't you delete this post? RainDog Jan 2013 #40
Because it's a well-known fact? nt Romulox Jan 2013 #42
I've listened to him on a couple of show interview over the last week tech3149 Jan 2013 #6
People know that marijuana is more potent now RainDog Jan 2013 #7
There was a study that showed it killed brain cells in monkeys RomneyLies Jan 2013 #16
Yes, Reagan flouted that bogus study RainDog Jan 2013 #18
Hopefully he'll never run for office again. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #19
"Pot today is waaay better than it was in the '70's" is the biggest lie told by the anti-pot people RomneyLies Jan 2013 #13
I think the difference is that people moved away from Mexican brick RainDog Jan 2013 #20
45% of USA consumed pot is grown in the USA. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #22
I saw a study that estimated 15-26% RainDog Jan 2013 #23
The only way to know for sure will be complete legalization. n/t RomneyLies Jan 2013 #24
I'd like to know who is financing SAM RainDog Jan 2013 #8
Anheuser Busch? Taverner Jan 2013 #11
It sounds like basically he's pissed off they didn't take the measure seriously RomneyLies Jan 2013 #21
As I said - I want to know who is funding this organization RainDog Jan 2013 #25
We'll have to watch this one closely RomneyLies Jan 2013 #26
Who knows? RainDog Jan 2013 #30
Bingo. Warren DeMontague Jan 2013 #33
In fact, I'd like to know so much that I asked them who is providing their funding RainDog Jan 2013 #10
What's his angle, his stake in the game? didact Jan 2013 #12
That's the question that will be answered n/t RainDog Jan 2013 #35
This is the sleeper issue that Republicans could use for a comeback RomneyLies Jan 2013 #14
Nate Silver already noted that repubs should back off on the culture war RainDog Jan 2013 #17
I signed the petition. SAM is a scam....... think Jan 2013 #27
good for you! RainDog Jan 2013 #31
The elite have it wrong again .... MindMover Jan 2013 #28
The Colorado Democratic Party endorsed legalization RainDog Jan 2013 #29
The Kennedy's are not gods Tabasco_Dave Jan 2013 #32
LOL. But he doesn't have a right to his own "facts" RainDog Jan 2013 #34
Patrick Kennedy is an idiot or shilling for Big Pharma. Or both. TeamPooka Jan 2013 #36
so far I don't see my that my question was addressed RainDog Jan 2013 #37
I do not get his "rush to judgement" or anything else he tried to make a point with... MrMickeysMom Jan 2013 #38
Who stands to lose? For-profit prisons RainDog Jan 2013 #39
Right on, RainDog MrMickeysMom Jan 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patrick Kennedy spouts no...