Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm being honest here. What's the thing with [View all]doc03
(39,094 posts)45. I was drafted in 1968 when they were transitioning from the M-14
to the M-16. We were issued the M-14 and I qualified expert with it, I never once had a malfunction with it. We had I think one day on the range with the M-16. The M-16 felt like a cheap toy to me, mine jammed a couple times while shooting target but it was accurate and easy to shoot. They let us shoot a magazine in three round bursts, I had a jam on that too. I was lucky I was sent to Germany so I never used either one in combat. Guys I have talked to that were in Vietnam complained that the least little bit of dirt would make the M-16 malfunction. They all praised the AK-47 as being a far better weapon and it is built like a tank and super reliable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't have an answer for you, upaloopa. But since this is a gun thread,
ChisolmTrailDem
Jan 2013
#2
So, smartass, I am responding to your statement that AR15s are the hunting rifle of choice and have
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#63
That's exactly what it's about. The MEN in my family never needed sissy guns like the AR15 to
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#66
No, I'm sorry, if you are collecting guns as if they are baseball cards....
Tommy_Carcetti
Jan 2013
#116
When something is illogical, it is by its very nature hard to understand.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jan 2013
#119
I never understand why we try to make more laws to fix the problem when we don't enforce old laws.
dkf
Jan 2013
#55
When you are dealing with a deadly weapon, then yes, there should be some sort of justification.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jan 2013
#91
Perhaps for those of us who are blissfully unaware, and kicking and screaming not to need to know,
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#53
I can see your thinking is rooted in a logical thought process rather than irrational emotion.
OneTenthofOnePercent
Jan 2013
#57
Right. We certainly would not want to be emotional...gasp...about little events like gun mutilation
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#70
Sorry, not so. No porn of any kind kills kids...very bad analogy. Red Herring for today.
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#105
RE .PS Your waving thier bodies about as a bloody shirt for an agenda you already hold dear
SQUEE
Jan 2013
#106
What I hold dear are lives. What I do not hold dear is funding $175 billion for Rights
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#107
It's always a wonderful thing when the push and pull of differing opinions make a new reality
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#112
Why do people want an iPhone when they're overpriced & don't work as well as other phones?
Honeycombe8
Jan 2013
#73