Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:04 PM Jan 2013

NRA responds to ad outrage: Obama children ad not about Obama children [View all]

NRA responds to ad outrage: Obama children ad not about Obama children

by Steveningen

NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam responded to the outrage over their despicable ad bemoaning President Obama's children receiving Secret Service protection while your children get nothing.

Whoever thinks the ad is about President Obama's daughters are missing the point completely or they're trying to change the subject. This ad is about keeping our children safe. And the President said he was skeptical about the NRA proposal to put policemen in all schools in this country. Yet he and his family are beneficiaries of multiple law enforcement officers surrounding them 24 hours a day.

That's the real issue. Anything else is an attempted calculated distraction.


<...>

Are the president’s kids more important than yours? Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he’s just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security.

Right. That had absolutely nothing to do with the President's children, nor was it a personal attack on President Obama. We are just taking the ad out of context and using it as a distraction for our own ends.

These people are about as craven as they come. Good luck convincing anyone that criticism of this reprehensible message is a distraction.

Not even Joe Scarborough is buying it.

From the link at Media Matters:

Scarborough, who as a Congressman was a strong supporter of the NRA, responded to the ad, asking "what's wrong with these people?" He continued, pointing out that once Obama decided to run for president, his children "have targets on their backs." Scarborough also said that the NRA is now a "fringe organization with millions of mainstream members." He concluded by saying the ad was "frightening and over the line".

When the NRA loses someone as wingnutty as Joe Scarborough, you know they are backed into a corner. And now that we have them backed into a corner, it's time to push them back under that rock they crawled out from under.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/16/1179446/-NRA-responds-to-ad-outrage-Obama-children-ad-not-about-Obama-children




18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FUCK THE NRA! The reason Obama and his family have secret service protection is BECAUSE HE IS THE still_one Jan 2013 #1
First, it would have to be explained to the media. russspeakeasy Jan 2013 #7
You are so right unfortunately still_one Jan 2013 #8
Just un-fucking-conscionable MotherPetrie Jan 2013 #2
That's just Nucking Futs RomneyLies Jan 2013 #3
Uh, Wayne? I'm still not buying it derby378 Jan 2013 #4
NRA - Nutball Rightwing Assholes. Rex Jan 2013 #5
They just don't get it. lpbk2713 Jan 2013 #6
They do get it ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #13
400% more death threats against Obama than Bush, per year! The Obamas are threatened daily riderinthestorm Jan 2013 #9
Let's see I make an ad that asks, "Are the president's kids more important than yours", sinkingfeeling Jan 2013 #10
Do they not understand the difference between being the President and being a regular person? Chorophyll Jan 2013 #11
If something happened to the President's children Aerows Jan 2013 #12
BULLSHIT. Utterly absurd BULLSHIT. If that were true, Malia & Sasha's pictures would NOT be in it. patrice Jan 2013 #14
If it wasn't about Obama's children, then the ad would have used 'children of the presidents' as Nay Jan 2013 #15
According to the RW, only WHITE presidents and their families are entitled to full Secret Service kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #16
Liars. n/t Scurrilous Jan 2013 #17
The NRA flat ass don't get it madokie Jan 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NRA responds to ad outrag...