Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NRA responds to ad outrage: Obama children ad not about Obama children [View all]
NRA responds to ad outrage: Obama children ad not about Obama children
by Steveningen
NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam responded to the outrage over their despicable ad bemoaning President Obama's children receiving Secret Service protection while your children get nothing.
<...>
Right. That had absolutely nothing to do with the President's children, nor was it a personal attack on President Obama. We are just taking the ad out of context and using it as a distraction for our own ends.
These people are about as craven as they come. Good luck convincing anyone that criticism of this reprehensible message is a distraction.
Not even Joe Scarborough is buying it.
From the link at Media Matters:
When the NRA loses someone as wingnutty as Joe Scarborough, you know they are backed into a corner. And now that we have them backed into a corner, it's time to push them back under that rock they crawled out from under.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/16/1179446/-NRA-responds-to-ad-outrage-Obama-children-ad-not-about-Obama-children
by Steveningen
NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam responded to the outrage over their despicable ad bemoaning President Obama's children receiving Secret Service protection while your children get nothing.
Whoever thinks the ad is about President Obama's daughters are missing the point completely or they're trying to change the subject. This ad is about keeping our children safe. And the President said he was skeptical about the NRA proposal to put policemen in all schools in this country. Yet he and his family are beneficiaries of multiple law enforcement officers surrounding them 24 hours a day.
That's the real issue. Anything else is an attempted calculated distraction.
<...>
Are the presidents kids more important than yours? Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but hes just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security.
Right. That had absolutely nothing to do with the President's children, nor was it a personal attack on President Obama. We are just taking the ad out of context and using it as a distraction for our own ends.
These people are about as craven as they come. Good luck convincing anyone that criticism of this reprehensible message is a distraction.
Not even Joe Scarborough is buying it.
From the link at Media Matters:
Scarborough, who as a Congressman was a strong supporter of the NRA, responded to the ad, asking "what's wrong with these people?" He continued, pointing out that once Obama decided to run for president, his children "have targets on their backs." Scarborough also said that the NRA is now a "fringe organization with millions of mainstream members." He concluded by saying the ad was "frightening and over the line".
When the NRA loses someone as wingnutty as Joe Scarborough, you know they are backed into a corner. And now that we have them backed into a corner, it's time to push them back under that rock they crawled out from under.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/16/1179446/-NRA-responds-to-ad-outrage-Obama-children-ad-not-about-Obama-children
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA responds to ad outrage: Obama children ad not about Obama children [View all]
ProSense
Jan 2013
OP
FUCK THE NRA! The reason Obama and his family have secret service protection is BECAUSE HE IS THE
still_one
Jan 2013
#1
400% more death threats against Obama than Bush, per year! The Obamas are threatened daily
riderinthestorm
Jan 2013
#9
Let's see I make an ad that asks, "Are the president's kids more important than yours",
sinkingfeeling
Jan 2013
#10
Do they not understand the difference between being the President and being a regular person?
Chorophyll
Jan 2013
#11
BULLSHIT. Utterly absurd BULLSHIT. If that were true, Malia & Sasha's pictures would NOT be in it.
patrice
Jan 2013
#14
If it wasn't about Obama's children, then the ad would have used 'children of the presidents' as
Nay
Jan 2013
#15
According to the RW, only WHITE presidents and their families are entitled to full Secret Service
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#16