Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
15. I see no upside to either #2 or #3.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:42 PM
Jan 2013

I just don't think either of those measures - no matter how successful they are at removing those items from society can actually greatly impact incidence of crime. This is simply because they don't already comprise or enable any significant component of current crime and these two issues generate the most pushback. They might be scary to others and have no meaningful necessity - but there are other factors much more responsible for the american public health gun problem.

I think the four absolute best things we could do are:
1) 100% background checks - just make everyone go through an FFL
2) Tighter NICS checks - Tighten reporting requirements for a more comprehensive database.
3) Actually prosecute incidents where prohibited persons try and buy guns.
4) Mandatory sentencing for violent & domestic crime involving firearms

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I didn't get the details on the executive orders JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2013 #1
RomneyLies has a thread listing them all Recursion Jan 2013 #2
Thanks for that link JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2013 #9
I agree, however I suspect nothing will happen, even with just background checks with this Congress still_one Jan 2013 #3
It was great. Sane, rational, poetic, & filled with common sense. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #4
unfortunately, PoliticalBiker Jan 2013 #19
Only in the Republican Party. We're quite comfortable with common sense on this side of the aisle. Scuba Jan 2013 #21
A question: panader0 Jan 2013 #5
pretty much every awb out there has grandfathered existing items. nt OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #7
I really wish this "precious" stuff would stop, but to answer you Recursion Jan 2013 #8
In mass where we kept the AWB, high capacity mags are grandfathered in Marrah_G Jan 2013 #13
I agree with 4 of those. I disagree with #2 and dont care either way about #3. nt OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #6
I'd tie #3 with a higher-than-market-value buyback Recursion Jan 2013 #11
I see no upside to either #2 or #3. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #15
I agree that those 4 are what matter Recursion Jan 2013 #17
In general, I don't like any restrictions without social benefit. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #20
7. Basically told people to stop blaming the mentally ill Cetacea Jan 2013 #10
That was great Recursion Jan 2013 #12
+1000 Cetacea Jan 2013 #14
NY appears to disagree with him hack89 Jan 2013 #18
Liberals like facts. Andrew is no liberal. And he is no Obama. Cetacea Jan 2013 #22
"the 2nd amendment protects a legitimate individual right" - sweet! nt hack89 Jan 2013 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An outstanding speech on ...»Reply #15