General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)The LINK I provided to Lattimer's research takes you to the McAdams site, but it wasn't written by McAdams. McAdams cites the pages in Lattimer's book where he got the excerpt.
No matter what you think of McAdams, the quote I posted was not by McAdams, but by the author of the book, "Kennedy & Lincoln." That author got to physically examine the actual evidence in the case, and in great detail. I could have provided a different link had I wanted. The info would have been exactly the same.
Your attempts at discrediting people are risible and verging on the pathetic. Following your logic, if George W Bush said that Neil Armstrong was the first man to walk on the moon we should consider it to be a lie because Bush lied a lot.
And I notice you have not addresses the "issue" brought up by Lattimer, an issue that totally discredits your post that I replied to concerning the weight of the bullets.
But why bother? Your entire premise of there being too many fragments in Connally to have come from a single Western ammo round is stupidity personified, because it is can only be based on the idea that all of the Western cartridge rounds weighed the same. And not only that, but that they all weighed at the lowest end of the range of weights Lattimer describes.
But the FACT is - and as Lattimer relates - bullets from the exact same lot of bullets from which CE399 came WERE NOT OF UNIFORM WEIGHT! There was a range of weights. Ergo, if CE399 happened to be a weightier bullet, it could have easily lost the amount of weight through fragmentation that was found missing from CE399. In fact, according to Lattimer's detailed research, CE399 would have had plenty of weight to it to leave the the weight of fragments it left in Connally even if it had weighed at the median weight of the lots of bullets from whence it came.
Which means the entire "weight of the fragments" argument is just another idiotic whack-a-mole CT red herring that is as stupid as it is meaningless.
BTW - why do you not address the FACT - and it is a fact - that the bullet fragments found in Connally were matched to CE399 through Neutron activation analysis? Does that mean nothing to you? Are you so anti-science and anti-evidence that you can't even accept that fact?
Or are you alleging that John Lattimer is also a person spreading disinformation?
Octafish - trying to prove a conspiracy by offering speculation, pictures of nobody in particular, he said/she said conjecture and hearsay. REAL evidence? Not so much.