Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Two words: "well regulated" are the answer to the whole thing. [View all]liberal N proud
(60,298 posts)62. You can regulate without infringing
You can allow people to own weapons, just regulate the number of rounds they are allowed to fire without reloading.
You still have your gun and there is less chance of someone killing 26 people at one pull of the trigger.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Two words: "well regulated" are the answer to the whole thing. [View all]
liberal N proud
Jan 2013
OP
Why is there a comma between "right of the people..." and "shall not be denied"?
lastlib
Jan 2013
#7
That there were two versions doesn't help matters either. For being such skilled writers, they
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2013
#22
What is a 21st century militia ... is every domicile a militia? Every truck with a gun rack?
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#18
IF YOU can't hit the target in 7 shots, you need to consider a new hobby
liberal N proud
Jan 2013
#67
That's what I'm saying. I disagree that "well-regulated" is the key, because that
petronius
Jan 2013
#74
I'm regulated just fine, and I don't need you to tell me what the Second Amendment means
slackmaster
Jan 2013
#51
Yeah. Heller doesn't say what its proponents or opponents seem to think it says
Recursion
Jan 2013
#89
Those Mofos have seen only what they want to see in the Second Amendment for decades.
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#63