Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav

(408 posts)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:52 PM Jan 2013

Filmmaker Gets 4 Years for Grossing Out Jurors [View all]

Jacob Sullum|Jan. 16, 2013 7:41 pm

Today Ira Isaacs, a self-described "shock artist," was sentenced to four years in federal prison for shocking people a little too much. The FBI describes his crimes:

Evidence presented at trial established that beginning in or about 1999 and continuing until at least 2011, Isaacs, doing business under the name LA. Media, operated numerous websites, through which he advertised and sold obscene videos that he acquired from other people. The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals. The evidence presented at trial also established that in approximately 2004, Isaacs began operating under the name Stolen Car Films and made obscene videos in which he instructed women to engage in sexual activity involving human bodily waste.


http://reason.com/blog/2013/01/16/fillmmaker-gets-four-years-in-prison-for

I don't agree with what he was doing on a moral level and personally this disgusts me. I didn't see the films so I'm not sure if animal cruelty could be an issue, however as long as the humans involved were consenting adults and the humans who watch are consenting adults, I believe he should have by law the right to film this crap.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Filmmaker Gets 4 Years for Grossing Out Jurors [View all] DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 OP
Oh, This Is Going To End Well, Fella.... The Magistrate Jan 2013 #1
Four Jurors One Hide jberryhill Jan 2013 #28
Are the animals consenting adults? Luminous Animal Jan 2013 #2
Oh boy. HappyMe Jan 2013 #3
yikes, I'm grossed out just reading it quinnox Jan 2013 #4
The defense should have packed the panel with DU jurors Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #5
So it would end in chaos and inflghting and be declared a mistrial? randome Jan 2013 #19
I'd imagine animal cruelty is the issue. alphafemale Jan 2013 #6
Wasn't there a SCOTUS case, in which only Alito objected to crush films? n/t Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #27
Revolting, disgusting, horrible, and protected by the 1st Amendment. nt Deep13 Jan 2013 #7
Beastiality is protected by the 1st Amendment? NT EOTE Jan 2013 #18
The portrayal of it is... Deep13 Jan 2013 #24
Anyone care to join me on the couch? bunnies Jan 2013 #8
Pass the salt wouldja? lpbk2713 Jan 2013 #10
Ive got plenty! bunnies Jan 2013 #11
I smell a "progressive blue screen of death" coming... Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #9
Look, I can live with obscenity laws Hippo_Tron Jan 2013 #16
And besides 2naSalit Jan 2013 #17
I'm personally a big believer in severe public beatings for douchebag behavior... Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #21
Patronizing women and telling them they can't make their own choices NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #25
Freedom is the absense of coercion, not merely being physically unimpeded by authority. Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #32
Which goes back to my point. NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #33
If you want to believe that a tangible number of people completely free of coersive forces Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #34
I was responding to the more general point you made about porn. NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #35
the general point was about DU's sacred cows Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #36
I can support his right to free expression until he starts hurting animals bluestateguy Jan 2013 #12
From the movie First Monday in October (1981) rrneck Jan 2013 #13
When I first read a review of this, I thought I was reading a parody: REP Jan 2013 #31
Dummy, he should have just called it "performance art" n/t flamingdem Jan 2013 #14
Sex with animals is animal cruelty, not protected by free speech RedCappedBandit Jan 2013 #15
Animals can't consent. This is likely animal cruelty, MadrasT Jan 2013 #20
They also don't consent to being poleaxed kenny blankenship Jan 2013 #23
Fuck that animal abuser. Hope he enjoys prison. LeftyMom Jan 2013 #22
Plenty of his kind there. undeterred Jan 2013 #26
Consenting adults who cares the animals did not have a choice and he deserves more than jail stultusporcos Jan 2013 #29
animal abusers can go to hell Texasgal Jan 2013 #30
It's really simple... derby378 Jan 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Filmmaker Gets 4 Years fo...