Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,375 posts)

4. It's because it circumvents the fixed magazine requirement

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 03:04 PM

Jan 2013

There was a recent debate over it in the Californian legislature. This story explains why they want to ban the bullet button.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/09/25/fallout-in-sacramento-over-bill-to-ban-bullet-button/

Edit: Looks like I was beaten to the punch while finding a link.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can somebody explain why Feinstein's proposed AWB bans bullet buttons? [View all] Recursion Jan 2013 OP

Well instead of slotting the driver and twisting... TheMightyFavog Jan 2013 #1

I think this is what is meant by that Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #2

Because pro gun people like it ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #3

It's because it circumvents the fixed magazine requirement Revanchist Jan 2013 #4

So it's "fixed" but not sufficiently fixed for these purposes? Recursion Jan 2013 #5

I believe (not positive because I no longer live in Cali) Revanchist Jan 2013 #6