General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)Marina Oswald's story has changed and evolved over the years. Which version do you choose to believe?
G Robert Blakeley objective? Hardly. He's convinced the mob killed JFK and won't move off that position, even though he himself has stated that the "second shooter" theory would be falsified by showing that motorcycle cop HD McClain was not at the corner of Elm & Houston to record the "4th shot" on the dictabelt tape. Well, that has been conclusively falsified for over a decade, yet where is Blakely? Still clinging to his "the mob did it," when even the HSCA for which he headed the investigation concluded the mob wasn't involved. Still averring that a 4th shot was fired from the grassy knoll when the very proof HE demanded be shown to falsify the claim has been provided.
He's an ideologue at this point.
Phrases like "Marina Oswald seems to indicate" are by definition NOT objective. You're offering an opinion there. Can't you see that?
Phrases like "which purportedly is based on foreign intelligence research commissioned by RFK" are speculative, not objective. Can't you see that?
And while I appreciate you acknowledging engaging in speculation when you write, "I said Oswald MAY have been involved in gun-running, but the evidence is not solid," I have to ask: why include that in a post purporting to offer OBJECTIVE proof for your theories?
So, yeah, I have problems with each and every "point" you've made here.