Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What is the reason we are not having the inauguration day events today? [View all]Journeyman
(15,450 posts)26. Reagan didn't. He was sworn in privately for his second term with a public event the next day. . .
It was Super Bowl Sunday as well, and he probably didn't want his event eclipsed in the news by the 49ers win.
The precedent, by the way, for holding private inaugurals when the 20th falls on a Sunday was set by Eisenhower on the occasion of his second, same as Reagan's second, and now Obama's. When and if we'll ever see a challenge to this will be when a President's first term begins on a Sunday. But even then, I doubt anyone would ever challenge it. Why get off on such a rocky start by challenging the people's sensibilities. Tradition, doncha know.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What is the reason we are not having the inauguration day events today? [View all]
RB TexLa
Jan 2013
OP
Whether or not it makes sense to you; I'm pretty sure you know the reason the official party
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2013
#6
No I don't. That is why I asked. But I guess I should have checked with you as you seem to know
RB TexLa
Jan 2013
#8
Then move on to the next thread to tell them you know more about what they do and don't know.
RB TexLa
Jan 2013
#22
Well let's see... in the last month and a half I've heard these two words AD NAUSEUM:
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2013
#62
Don't ever even begin to think you know what you know or don't know better than they do
RB TexLa
Jan 2013
#79
'Tis true. What President wants the headlines to read: "Superbowl Set! (So & So Inaugurated)". . .
Journeyman
Jan 2013
#14
I think the decision not to hold the public ceremony today was made by the President
slackmaster
Jan 2013
#7
Yes, and it's still the President's prerogative to decide when to hold a public ceremony
slackmaster
Jan 2013
#25
Yes -- I hear someone say "at least since Eisenhower..." you've cited even more instances. :)
gateley
Jan 2013
#27
Can you imagine what the histoey books would have to say about Tilden had he succeeded?
Sekhmets Daughter
Jan 2013
#101
While, on the one hand, civil observance of private sabbaths is problematic...
jberryhill
Jan 2013
#85
Reagan didn't. He was sworn in privately for his second term with a public event the next day. . .
Journeyman
Jan 2013
#26
Well, I'm a Christian & I think it's weird not to have the festivities on Sunday
WolverineDG
Jan 2013
#31
Sworn In On MLK Birthday - Tomorrow - Symbolic - FrightWing Heads Will Explode
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#18
We Celebrate MLK's Birthday Tomorrow - Still Symbolic - Heads Will Be Exploding
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#87
Inaugural addresses have always been given on a Monday if the inauguration is on a Sunday.
MotherPetrie
Jan 2013
#39
Well, if by law the president has to be sworn on the 20th, why wait until Monday?
Beacool
Jan 2013
#51
As you point out, they didn't "wait until Monday". The President was sworn in today.
onenote
Jan 2013
#54
Yes, but that has nothing to do with why inaugural ceremonies are moved to Monday
onenote
Jan 2013
#63
This answer, amazingly enough, is an excellent response to almost all of the OP's OPs.
Brickbat
Jan 2013
#71