Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If pro gun people are going to insist that assault rifles can't be banned due to definition problems [View all]rrneck
(17,671 posts)1. That makes more sense.
At least you're suggesting the regulation of the actual lethality of the gun instead of how it looks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If pro gun people are going to insist that assault rifles can't be banned due to definition problems [View all]
dsc
Jan 2013
OP
What side track hysteria is trying to put "looks" into the conversation?
Ruby the Liberal
Jan 2013
#5
I can't speak for rrneck, but when I hear the vague phrase "military style" as something
petronius
Jan 2013
#10
My attitude toward gun nutters is only going to get shittier at this point. So
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#52
Technically speaking AR15s and all semi-autos recock to be fired again and meet your definition.
aikoaiko
Jan 2013
#6
Its looks like support for an AWB is slipping away so I cant see even more strict laws passing.
aikoaiko
Jan 2013
#15
Good luck with that. I don't see any real support for that type of restriction.
aikoaiko
Jan 2013
#17