General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Santorum: Armor-piercing bullets are ‘a right in our country’ [View all]OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)that civilians can own body armor. Two technical points that were relevent to the posts I responded to. I never took a stance or outlayed a personal opinon on anything regarding restrictions (or wanting a lack of restrictions) in this subthread. You need to take an internet break... I'm not sure why you're getting all irrational, here, and projecting onto others.
I'm not even sure How you managed to drag civillian AK/AR possession into this thread. The thread is about armor peircing ammunition, which I do believe there is a restriction on already from the 80's or 90's - no handgun AP ammo and no new rifle AP ammo (only old leftover bullets on the market). It sounds like your biggest gripe lies with technological advancement and the inability to govern The People's inginuity in regards to working around poorly written, ignorantly conceived and ill-performing legislation.
As to your mini-diatribe on minorities and "We want an AWB...period", I don't give a shit who "we" is or what they want. Rights are recognized inherently protect the minority. That's the point; so a majority of We's/Wanter's demands don't trample the rights and actions of minority groups. So unless "we" includes enough people to repeal 2nd amendment protections then Have a nice day, you're concerns are noted.