General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To those bemoaning the presence of the divine in the inauguration [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Using military interventions to stabilize marketplaces and promote economic growth (under the guise of promoting freedom abroad) is an idea espoused by this camp. Forgive me if I am mistaken, but I thought they endorsed militarism as a means of molding the world according to their vision.
My main point was regarding shedding blood in the name of some greater "good". Where do we draw the line? There are extremes on both sides of such a line, are there not? Invoking one instance of a justified intervention (from our perspective) does not thereby justify every possible intervention.
In any case, its not the point here in this example. There is no "good" being fought for. There is a cultural narrative regarding the preservation of a (crazy) nation-state, which can not objectively be defined as an a priori "good" at this present time.