General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To those bemoaning the presence of the divine in the inauguration [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The poster attempted to make the point that the quoted piece claims "it clearly lays out the rule: no prayers in government functions." It does no such thing. Even you noted differences. I think that is why I am not following. It seemed like you were disagreeing with me, while at the same time agreeing with me.
"I'm not saying prayer at the inauguration is necessarily illegal" Agree, it's not unconstitutional.
"it doesn't require participation like prayer in school" Exactly. A major difference from the statement posted by Warren.
"But your argument appears to not be talking about legal prayer at government functions." I don't know where you are getting this from. I have read back and my argument was simple and very clear. The quoted piece has nothing to do with an event like the inauguration. Not does the quote state what the poster claims it states. "it clearly lays out the rule: no prayers in government functions."
I think you read things into my argument that just aren't there.