Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

muriel_volestrangler

(106,599 posts)

4. A reason? You're accusing Obama of doing it to benefit Buffett?

Reply to Karmadillo (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:23 AM

Jan 2012

Wow. I didn't think I'd see DU start a rumour like that. Were you in favour of the pipeline, then? Could you not see any reason to turn it down, so you have to reach for this?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A reason for the decision? Buffett�s Burlington Northern Among Pipeline Winners [View all] Karmadillo Jan 2012 OP

Doesn't make tar sands a better source of energy. However-- eridani Jan 2012 #1

TransCanada, Koch Brothers. tsuki Jan 2012 #2

K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #3

A reason? You're accusing Obama of doing it to benefit Buffett? muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #4

Why spread right wing talking points? FSogol Jan 2012 #5

Keep trying...nt SidDithers Jan 2012 #6

You ignore the very obvious true reason that was given by the administration karynnj Jan 2012 #7

BULL SHIT FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #8