General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Insulting Invocation [View all]garthranzz
(1,330 posts)I was careful to cordon off the objectionable element.
There was one part of the invocation, a side-speech, that I found offensive and out-of-place. All the more so, now that you tell me the minister is from a gay-affirming church. I did not state anything ugly. Contentious? Perhaps. But when an invocation in a secular context, whose theme is yet shared faith, excludes all but one faith community and one form of worship, I think it's worth objecting.
This is not "swooning." Proselytization, even veiled, is worth discussing. So is lack of sensitivity.
Give it up? Really?!? So should you "give up" being offended by racist, sexist, anti-gay attitudes or remarks that exclude or demote a particular group?
Why is it not allowed to post a negative reaction or an objection?