General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So now there's also a "post-inaugural prayer service at National Cathedral"... [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)I would hope you won't try to shove North Korea down our throats as an example to follow, though.
France, maybe? They wouldn't consult with religious leaders on issues of national law, now, would they?
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/hollande-meets-france-s-chief-rabbi-on-gay-marriage-bill-1.493374
Russia? Surely Putin would toe the secular line....no? http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/12/03/russia-religion-law-putin-idINDEE8B203V20121203
How about those crackin' down Chinese? Ooops...they favor religious freedom, too, even though they can get shirty every now and again... http://www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/china/pro-religion.htm
Surely the Bolivaran Revolutionaries in Venezuela eschew that religion stuff? No?
http://hollowverse.com/hugo-chavez/
And even CASTRO acknowledged (see link above) that he is a "Christian in the social sense."
The bottom line is that most nations pay some degree of lip service to those who choose to follow a religious path.
A half century, a century ago? I'd say you might have something to gripe about. Nowadays, though, religion in politics -- at least when Democrats are running the show--is more about INCLUSION of all groups; not dictating religious practices of one group to the masses. There's a difference.