Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
59. It's not the size of our economy, it's our income distribution that's the problem.
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 06:33 AM
Jan 2013

With US per capita income at $49,600 it would be easy to increase our standard of living without growing the economy or producing more CO2 if we distributed our income on a more equitable basis.

German per capita income is $43,700; France's $45,500; for the European Union as a whole it is $35,100. Most of us would figure that their standard of living is better than ours because of the safety net and public services that they have.

With respect to pollution, Europe has much more stringent pollution controls than the US so Germany produces much less CO2 with its $43,000 or France with its $45,000 than we do with our $49,000.

Our $49,600 could stay the same for decades and our 99% would still enjoy an increasing standard of living if we gradually improved our income distribution. Of course such stability in the overall economy (or an effective effort to reduce our CO2 emissions) would not benefit our 1% (who depend on an ever-growing economy) so it is not likely to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, we can't continue growing. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #1
You waste enough H2O brushing your teeth to water a village leftstreet Jan 2013 #2
Beg pardon? derby378 Jan 2013 #16
To be fair... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #20
Domestic water use is a fairly small part of the overall amount muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #25
I was referring more to what it takes to bring it to the tap NoOneMan Jan 2013 #27
Another good argument against Tar Sand development Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2013 #32
Argue until you are blue in the face NoOneMan Jan 2013 #33
yup Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2013 #34
I agree. I really think it is too late. Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #56
Speak for yourself TxRider Jan 2013 #52
Way to go! NoOneMan Jan 2013 #54
I live on a community well pscot Jan 2013 #17
Succinctly done. immoderate Jan 2013 #5
"and their footprint" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #9
When I had presentations.... NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #13
The global average standard of living can increase, but... Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #3
How? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #6
You're half right pscot Jan 2013 #18
Americans gave up healthcare so Canadians could have it? leftstreet Jan 2013 #29
Where did that come from? Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #41
You suggested it leftstreet Jan 2013 #43
Aside from your strange Canada/America example, it very well mean this NoOneMan Jan 2013 #55
Check this out regarding global emissions.... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #30
It's not the size of our economy, it's our income distribution that's the problem. pampango Jan 2013 #59
I'm not sure why growth and equality are lumped together. RedCappedBandit Jan 2013 #4
Can they not be? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #7
Aye, there's the rub. rrneck Jan 2013 #8
Sure, once our CEOs and shareholders lose their entitlement mentality Recursion Jan 2013 #10
This level of profit promotes disparity, and disparity throttles growth NoOneMan Jan 2013 #12
i'll be the buzzkill datasuspect Jan 2013 #11
First of all 2naSalit Jan 2013 #14
These ideas can't do anything for the global situation unless implemented en masse NoOneMan Jan 2013 #15
I agree with about 2naSalit Jan 2013 #24
"If a sizable group of people..." NoOneMan Jan 2013 #28
I doubt we can do a thing about climate change at this point. JVS Jan 2013 #19
So all this talk about equality and making a better world... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #22
New technologies and new expansion? cbrer Jan 2013 #21
Ok, the magic of technology NoOneMan Jan 2013 #23
Tangible Proof? cbrer Jan 2013 #36
Yes, like a non-faith-based reason to continue our pursuit of "progress" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #37
You think I meant religion? cbrer Jan 2013 #38
"Technology got us to this place." NoOneMan Jan 2013 #39
You effectively shoot down every suggestion cbrer Jan 2013 #40
Sure did NoOneMan Jan 2013 #42
"bring civilization back to the drawing board immediately" cbrer Jan 2013 #44
Yes, and then we get a reboot (whatever that means) NoOneMan Jan 2013 #47
with technology and good governance we can samsingh Jan 2013 #26
A good government will make climate change illegal? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #31
agreed samsingh Jan 2013 #35
Human need vs human greed YoungDemCA Jan 2013 #45
Go vegan. n/t flvegan Jan 2013 #46
Hunted meat probably has a lower footprint than farmed foods NoOneMan Jan 2013 #48
On an individual basis? Stipulated. flvegan Jan 2013 #49
About 78 billion tons of carbon is lost from our soil from agriculture NoOneMan Jan 2013 #51
Can billionaires prosper while kicking global warming? daleo Jan 2013 #50
Resistance to the change originates in a growth obsessed system... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #53
Average people don't have a lot of say in these matters daleo Jan 2013 #57
Climate change should take priority over growth and equality. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jan 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we achieve growth &am...»Reply #59