Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

indepat

(20,899 posts)
6. The best answer is maybe found in the recent failed attempt to change the Senate filibuster
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jan 2013

rule: Dems are mostly unwilling to press anything meaningful that Repugs object to. Another example: when a 2009 DHS report identifying domestic right-wing extremist groups as posing the greatest threat to America, its people and government, an even greater threat than posed by Islamic extremist groups, was released, Congressional Repugs went totally ape-shit and that issue went away. I suspect little has hereinafter been done to counter that threat considered greater than the threat posed by Islamic extremist groups, but Repugs have no problem with expending $100s of billions annually to thwart the Islamic extremist threat and don't even acknowledge the other threat 'cause, imo, they are a part of that threat. A third example is failure to have pushed for some reasonable gun control legislation, but that would have gone no where 'cause Repugs would have blocked any such heretical nonsense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Sirota: Raising tax...»Reply #6