Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
19. One of the people discussing the case mentioned the patent issue
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:59 AM
Jan 2013

the question was something like... okay, so the federal govt says there's no medical use for cannabis - so then why have they patented it.

the argument from the DEA is so full of b.s. it goes like this - cannabis has more than 400 compounds - that's because it's a plant, not a drug.

Plants are not simple molecular structures. The 4 points the DEA says that any medicine has to meet to qualify instantly disqualify cannabis, again, because cannabis is a plant, and not a drug.

That's why I say the world should just simply remove it from the drug schedules entirely - it's not a drug. It's a plant with psychotropic properties in some circumstances.

After nearly two decades of normalized use in Amsterdam and CA, the world hasn't come to an end, people are not raping grandmothers because they got high - none of the reefer madness scare stories have proved out.

And, what's really interesting about this is that Mayor LaGuardia, in NYC, was calling the federal govt on this shit just as he called them on prohibition. Too bad we don't have a Mayor LaGuardia in the northeast today to talk some sense.

Well, hell, they can't beat up on Wall Street Crooks! So they gotta beat up on someone! villager Jan 2013 #1
banks are too big to fail! - kick a veteran in the ass- no problem! RainDog Jan 2013 #3
Prohibition is a failed public policy...again nt TeamPooka Jan 2013 #2
intransigence causes harm RainDog Jan 2013 #4
+1 limpyhobbler Jan 2013 #7
+1,000 xoom Jan 2013 #9
kickety RainDog Jan 2013 #5
is this post an ad hominem attack? RainDog Jan 2013 #6
I believe we'll see some sanity in the 2nd term. Get out of Grandma's stash, for god's sake. libdem4life Jan 2013 #8
If I were a betting person RainDog Jan 2013 #10
I do think that. There is a large retirement, semi-rural development in No Cal. Last year a head libdem4life Jan 2013 #12
The division on this issue doesn't always fall on neatly partisan lines RainDog Jan 2013 #13
"want to pretend it's only Republicans who keep bad law in place" green for victory Jan 2013 #15
He lost a lot of support from the very issues you point out. I'd never vote for anyone who DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 #16
see, this is what I know - I am not going to agree with everyone on every issue RainDog Jan 2013 #17
In a way this reminds me of gay marriage.the issue is moving forward because people are experiencing libdem4life Jan 2013 #18
Yes. Social issues are usually grass roots RainDog Jan 2013 #20
Spot on...he also decimated mental health care in California...while he had Alzheimer's or libdem4life Jan 2013 #21
Off To The Greatest Page !!! WillyT Jan 2013 #11
$ green for victory Jan 2013 #14
One of the people discussing the case mentioned the patent issue RainDog Jan 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The biggest divide betwee...»Reply #19