Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ellisonz

(27,776 posts)
9. I agree with what you say for the most part
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:38 AM
Jan 2013

I would differ one a key point though, I see no hope for the end of conflict, and that as you note females are often enablers, so I'm not sure if using a gendered analysis of conflict as a penultimate part of the analysis is useful. Conflict is a human thing, violence is a human thing, and I see no end to it no matter the gender barriers that are leveled. What we need to happen to end "inevitability" of war is improbable because somewhere in the story of life on our planet, things went horribly wrong. Patriarchy could end, but I see no reason to believe that it would end war.

I hope that was clearly stated and am certainly open to debate on this point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent post! smirkymonkey Jan 2013 #1
People always said war would end if women were soldiers leftstreet Jan 2013 #2
Good Honest Post 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #3
thanks, redqueen. Whisp Jan 2013 #4
k and r--thank you for this excellent post, redqueen niyad Jan 2013 #5
K&R Whisp Jan 2013 #6
+100000. I have nothing to add but a huge K&R nt riderinthestorm Jan 2013 #7
Hopefully this will make it less so BainsBane Jan 2013 #8
I agree with what you say for the most part ellisonz Jan 2013 #9
Yes, I do see your point, redqueen Jan 2013 #11
I'm the mother of a female war veteran ismnotwasm Jan 2013 #10
draft RILib Jan 2013 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One feminist's thoughts a...»Reply #9