Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(15,064 posts)

9. Medical pot is "legal" according to their state law.

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 05:51 PM

Jan 2013

There is a difference. It's not "both ways" when you have competing federal and state laws.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN host calls out S.C. sheriff on refusal to enforce weapons ban [View all] Playinghardball Jan 2013 OP

Any sheriff who refuses to follow Federal law and/or executive orders Hayabusa Jan 2013 #1

They don't legally have to enforce Federal law hack89 Jan 2013 #3

True, but Hayabusa Jan 2013 #4

Because a rifle's shape is a silly thing to pass laws about? Recursion Jan 2013 #8

Because of who signed it. Hayabusa Jan 2013 #11

Signed what, exactly? cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #16

Pubs only care about the second amendment Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #2

He's just posturing for the benefit of his constituents tularetom Jan 2013 #5

Medical pot is "legal" according to their state law. Lint Head Jan 2013 #9

Assault weapons are legal according to their state law Recursion Jan 2013 #10

Assault weapons are not legal anywhere. Semi-automatics are legal. Lint Head Jan 2013 #12

I am *well* aware of the difference Recursion Jan 2013 #14

This is an ill informed and factually incorrect post. galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #15