General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women try to get recourse for revenge porn photo posts [View all]Xithras
(16,191 posts)The way the law is written, it applies to the people who take the photos and to the people who actually insert them into the website. There's a mile-wide loophole here though. If a website allows other people to upload photos and exerts no editorial control (like a porn version of Youtube or Flickr), then the site itself doesn't have to be 2257 compliant. In that situation, the website is a "service provider" and not a "producer" (because they're not creating the images, or selecting and placing them on the site), and is exempt from the law. The PHOTOGRAPHER is still bound by 2257, but not the website.
If these sites are just allowing people to upload photos, and the site owners aren't picking and choosing the photos themselves, tney don't have to be 2257 compliant.